WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0g66ge wrote
For some context, this is the equal-seventh lowest score in any format of professional cricket, and the lowest total in 40 years. All other totals equal or worse are from before the First World War.
In the BBL, the competition these teams compete it, the previous lowest score was 57.
JKKIDD231 t1_j0gib8s wrote
BBL popularity about to Sky Rocket with YT ratings of this match alone gonne go thru the roof. Waiting for highlights to be posted on YT.
yellowbin74 t1_j0gqe5u wrote
I have to go find this- probably doesn't even need a highlight reel
someguyonline00 t1_j0ium6g wrote
How were there 6 lower NON-T20 scores??
WakeUpMareeple OP t1_j0j8bn4 wrote
Pitches in the 1800s were a lot tougher to bat on.
someguyonline00 t1_j0jdrnn wrote
Ah true, but I am still amazed that there was a lower (or equal) non-T20 score 40 years ago
NekkiGamGam t1_j0kimtf wrote
Henry Thorntons bowling figures were 5 for 3 off 2.5 overs. More wickets than runs conceded. how many times would that have happened ever?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments