Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Malkovtheclown t1_j8yjm3g wrote

Reply to comment by Grostleton in Microsoft proposes AI ads in Bing by small44

But my point is, why is this a problem when basically a less advanced form of data collection and use is already being done? Public outrage should have already taken place if people cared. I don't think people will move to block this. They may feign outrage then use it anyway. I don't see what is going to get folks to really fight especially since it will be better at disguising the "ai" part in a response.

2

Grostleton t1_j8ymur6 wrote

Where's the implication that it's a "problem" other than your own apparent perception of it?

The title and the article itself are both pretty neutral, if not slightly positive, towards it.

1

Malkovtheclown t1_j8ynlwc wrote

Of course, it's positive. It's a puff piece to get people to be okay with better marketing tailored to sound as human as possible. The problem is that people basically have created an information bubble around themselves. Not because the information isn't available, but because the first results they see are pre-filtered for them. What you see as a search result is going to be different than what I see. That makes it easier for half truths and outright lies to spread. Better ai is going to make it worse. That's if there isn't some sort of eu take on privacy in adopted.

2

Grostleton t1_j8yp4c0 wrote

So you've shifted goalposts twice and are now just incoherently rambling about AI and personalized ads, purely because you couldn't be bothered to read the article. Got it.

0

Malkovtheclown t1_j8ypijl wrote

I read it. It's a nothing piece other than to say oh look millions want this new ad Spyware on their computer!

2

Grostleton t1_j8ypovx wrote

Great, glad you figured out the answer to your original question then.

Couldn't give a fuck about all the other uninformed nonsense you decided to spew out after, though. Goodbye!

1