Submitted by ActivePersona t3_11b6wx9 in technology
ModernCoder t1_j9xx0pp wrote
Reply to comment by 1wiseguy in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
Tbh there has been research that would allow somehow for the encrpytion to work ONLY if some words / phrases are not present.
It's a stupid thing but some genuinely want to do that. And it literally makes the encryption pointless if they do do that because then some "trusted" party makes a list of words and phrases which can be any fucking thing.
IamfromSpace t1_j9yjlt6 wrote
I’d love to see a paper linked, because that sounds absurd from the outset, lol
richalex2010 t1_j9ymd3x wrote
The issue is that it doesn't sound absurd to a politician or a regular person.
ModernCoder t1_j9yv6zw wrote
Here is one of the papers I managed to remember: https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2022/15600/pdf/LIPIcs-ITCS-2022-4.pdf
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments