Submitted by Sorin61 t3_z7qa8l in technology
Sniffy4 t1_iy9hw3q wrote
Reply to comment by anonymousviewer112 in UK waters down internet rules plan after free speech outcry by Sorin61
> You miss the point clearly
No I completely got your point, it just happens to be wrong.
There have *always* been boundaries on public discourse for good reason (people die) and pretending like there never have been is not helpful.
anonymousviewer112 t1_iy9yfrr wrote
Never said there weren't boundaries in the past, not sure where you got that from...
What I am saying is that outside of basic boundaries which generally involve the matter being settled in the courts, there hasn't been been effective more wholesale censorship implemented in a way that doesn't severely undermine democracy.
You are just throwing your opinion out there "more censorship will equal less hate speech" without any specific details on how such a complicated and vast system would operate.
Try this...explain in detail what would and would not constitute hate speech as well as inaccurate information.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments