Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

_MoveSwiftly t1_j65phvr wrote

Reply to comment by pmotiveforce in Intel Posts Largest Loss in Years as PC and Server Nosedives by Stiven_Crysis

"Intel 7" but it's actually 10nm
"Intel 4" but it's actually 7nm

That's marketing, and he keeps lying about how well they're doing and refusing to acknowledge AMD because they're too high and mighty, until he got his nose bloodied a bit.

0

pmotiveforce t1_j65xpeg wrote

Rubbish. Formerly Intel's 10nm was e.g. closer to TSMC's 7. Feature sizes are not as simple as "Xnm, derp!"". Intel's new naming scheme more closely aligns with what TSMC/Samsung are using.

4