Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

johnnyjay t1_j5tyq4b wrote

As mentioned above, if Netflix is budgeting shows at levels that require nearly unattainable viewership, then they have an unsustainable model and they are making poor choices with their programming. We saw this with The Sandman. It spent three weeks at Number 1, six weeks in the Top 5 and had a one-week high of 127.5 million hours viewed. Yet Neil Gaiman was telling people they needed to keep watching to assure it got a second season. How is a run like that not considered a huge success?

1

ambroserc316 t1_j5u097o wrote

I agree that it sucks as a viewer but some shows have to do huge (Wednesday or Stranger Things) numbers to justify their budgets.

Edit: Netflix is happy to risk a season on a show and see if it breaks out.

1