Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Mitthrawnuruo t1_j86f7b7 wrote

I’ve been on Ryan air. The list isn’t nearly restrictive enough.

49

pobody t1_j86h2z2 wrote

I mean, all first world countries do. I think the FAA follows the ICAO guidance for compliance.

4

LangMildInteressant t1_j87l1je wrote

Running properly maintained equipment is one aspect of safety and new equipment hasn't had time or use to degrade and is therefore mechanically sound and therefore safe.

One of the other aspects of safety, perhaps the most important, is competent pilots, engineers, and air traffic controllers. I'd venture that Lion Air has less experienced pilots and lower requirements to get hired. An inexperienced pilot can crash a new plane.

11

boysan98 t1_j87t6vd wrote

That is not the argument you think it is. That reflects more on bad pilots or poor maintaince. The 737-800’s crashes are overwhelmingly pilot error or maint failures. I see one that might be because of manufacturing issues.

9

capty26 t1_j887e12 wrote

Can confirm on the Congo airlines. Once was enough for them! I refuse all work now that requires flights to brazerville, regardless of carrier!

2

Naznarreb t1_j88en5d wrote

If you don't want to download the PDF, it's all small, regional carriers primarily from developing countries in Africa and the Middle East, though there are a number of carriers from Russia.

15

avipars t1_j8h6d4d wrote

What about air Jordan ?

1