Darealvvaldeezee t1_j92krsj wrote
Wow, who knows what would have happened if she hadn't had to turn them down?
Matthew_C1314 t1_j93zr1t wrote
This was during a time when the nba draft had several more rounds than today. Often teams just drafted whoever, because those people would never play. For example Bruce Jenner was drafted even though he hadn’t played since high school. It’s a big reason they dropped it down to 2 rounds. Even in the modern nba, the talent pools is severely diluted after the first 10 picks.
Igottherunsbad t1_j94t7ry wrote
They really only do two rounds? I mean the NHL is the same way (probably just the top 5 are really worth a shit - though obviously you can get lucky with a later pick that happens to pan out) but they still do 9 rounds I believe
girhen t1_j94yua5 wrote
Seven rounds - first three are most important. And 14 players from 2018s 4th or worse rounds have seen at least 1 game.
It is more of a gamble, but some players actually pan out later than others, and late picks often include Russians who might not even come over.
2ByteTheDecker t1_j95srdc wrote
There are more players on a hockey team than basketball.
hambluegar_sammwich t1_j9fpjk4 wrote
17 vs 23, and two of those 17 are 2-way players that are only kinda halfway on the team.
2ByteTheDecker t1_j9fprhs wrote
And most teams will only play 10-17 if the game is already out of reach (garbage time). There aren't multiple lines of players who actually get time/provide any particular value.
SlashStar t1_j94pxnz wrote
Just FYI, it is typically considered polite to use a trans person's current name, even when talking about a past event when they went by a previous name. Have a great day.
Look_to_the_Stars t1_j94t9s9 wrote
No, that makes no sense. Clarity and reason trump politeness in this case.
Desolecontra OP t1_j92ptjr wrote
Can I be honest with you?
TurkeySandwich007 t1_j92rec3 wrote
Oh boy
Desolecontra OP t1_j92s47k wrote
Lol. But There’s a reason there is a higher population of women in America and nobody watches the wnba. For genetic reasons, men are better at basketball and more fun to watch playing the sport than women. That’s all. She would’ve been terrible
Maverick_Walker t1_j92sbbt wrote
Facts. Just in the men’s though, she probably would have excelled in the women’s
Desolecontra OP t1_j92t4xu wrote
☝️ that part. I should’ve made that more clear.
Igottherunsbad t1_j94tfcd wrote
Or maybe just move on next time lol. Yeah people like mens basketball more. Personally I find both mens and womens basketball to be boring as shit. Who cares. Either way I want to blow my brains out after 20 seconds of sneakers squeaking.
Desolecontra OP t1_j92tmy9 wrote
I also don’t think she should’ve been put in the hall of fame. But I understand
[deleted] t1_j943czm wrote
[deleted]
Desolecontra OP t1_j943org wrote
True statement. I’m working on it. Be well
[deleted] t1_j9460ix wrote
[deleted]
Desolecontra OP t1_j94314u wrote
What about this statement isn’t true? Why so many downvotes?
TurkeySandwich007 t1_j94cp2t wrote
That’s why I said oh boy, no matter the logic behind your statement I knew it wasn’t gonna be received well.
If you’d said she’d be good in the NBA you’d probably be wrong. If you’d said she’d be bad, you’d be perceived as sexist. There was no way to win here.
Desolecontra OP t1_j94gpuy wrote
I know I know. I’m not sexist at all. Just being honest. But I get it.
armpitchoochoo t1_j94lusz wrote
The first step in being the best anti-sexist that you can be is to accept that you are, in fact, sexist. We all are to some degree, no way we could grow up in a sexist society without absorbing some of it
Desolecontra OP t1_j94m3hi wrote
Good point. Actually there’s no debating that.
RoyalSloth t1_j94m62a wrote
I mean saying that genetics is why MBB is “more fun to watch” is just wrong, whether or not something’s fun to someone is mostly due to personal taste and social influences
But I think the overarching reason is just adding stuff that was completely unnecessary to add, like “over half the population is women but no one watches the WNBA!” makes it seem like you wanted to talk about women being weaker than men more than actually answering the question that was asked
Desolecontra OP t1_j94mh0j wrote
I can see your point. Wasn’t my intention I promise.I was just honestly responding to a previous comment
GenerallyAwfulHuman t1_j94ln5g wrote
No can dunk, but good fundamentals. That more fun to watch.
whatweshouldcallyou t1_j95mens wrote
The WNBA has some amazing shooters, including possibly the best free throw shooter in the world (among men or women).
But anyone who thinks a WNBA player could make the NBA simply does not understand basketball.
[deleted] t1_j93z10z wrote
[deleted]
HeyVe1 t1_j94hxd6 wrote
Imagine they would put the NBA and the wnba together. How many women would play?
temujin64 t1_j93no1a wrote
Exactly. For example, women at the peak age for marathon times would be about as good a man in his late 50s.
She just wouldn't have the stamina, speed and power of even the worst make NBA players.
[deleted] t1_j94hcow wrote
[deleted]
Igottherunsbad t1_j94tmym wrote
Because you ain’t exactly blowing anyones mind my guy
You’re one of those people that talk just to talk aren’t you? Do you have an inner monologue? (Genuine question as I learned not too long ago that most people don’t actually have inner monologues which actually did blow my mind)
[deleted] t1_j94utsu wrote
[deleted]
Darealvvaldeezee t1_j936ri1 wrote
Lol it's okay, I can imagine the horrible reality of it for myself!
KingOnixTheThird t1_j94gtrc wrote
She would have gotten demolished if she tried out for an NBA team. No disrespect to her, and her skills, but NBA level men are on a whole different level physically.
At 5 ft 11, she would be too short to play the forward position, something she was known for in women's basketball, which means she would likely have to play a guard, which she likely wasn't quick enough for.
Her only shot to compete with the men was if she developed into a one-dimensional 3 point specialist where her only sole purpose was to get open for catch and shoot 3 pointers. Unfortunately for her at 5 ft 11, it would be harder for her to jump over taller men without getting her shot blocked.
Gofuckyourselffriend t1_j95vx4y wrote
Harris was 6’3.
Long (5’11) is a different person.
hastur777 t1_j94dxyz wrote
Probably wouldn’t have played
whatweshouldcallyou t1_j95m8gb wrote
She would not have played a second in the NBA.
There is no WNBA player who could make an NBA team. Or a D1 college team. D2 would be questionable.
That's not to say they aren't skilled, great athletes--theu are. But it is a different game and they can not compete against professional male players.
Desolecontra OP t1_j9ab9p6 wrote
Exactly. That’s all I’m saying.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments