Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

LongWalk86 t1_j3nn8az wrote

Salary of a 1947 House Rep was $12,500. The price of the car was $3550. This would similar to the house Democrats buying the current minority leader a Kia. Something he clearly could have bought for himself if he wanted too. Seems more like some kind of stunt by his fellow reps.

27

Potatoswatter t1_j3nxmme wrote

The Cadillac Fleetwood was no Kia. Official inflation stats say “only” $47k 2023 USD but it was the top production car from the top luxury brand.

66

LongWalk86 t1_j3nyb0d wrote

Oh for sure, I just meant the price was, in today's dollars, more what you would pay for an entire of mid-level car, not even the comparable Caddie of today.

8

StoneTemplePilates t1_j3q6yli wrote

Not even close.

$3,550 is 28.4% of $12.5k

House members get paid $174k today. 28.4% of that is $49.5k. That's a BMW 3 series, not a Kia.

10

TastyBullfrog2755 t1_j3ny3j8 wrote

A quarter of his salary? What was Joe Taxpayer making?

9

LongWalk86 t1_j3o0y8w wrote

A quarter of your yearly salary on a car is not that unrealistic. Most people making under 100k a year will still buy a car worth more than 25k.

3

ShuRugal t1_j3o7bda wrote

not in 1947. The words "Car loan" would have got you laughed out of the bank in that era. After the market crash and banking collapse of the Great Depression, consumer loans of any kind just weren't a thing. The idea of a "car loan" as we know it today didn't take off again until the mid 60s.

20

big_sugi t1_j3qxybb wrote

The tax rates in 1947 were higher/the brackets were lower. $3550 would have represented almost 6 months’ salary.

1