I noticed you switched ages when making your comparison. I see this pattern often when someone argues this point. Can you explain your rationale for framing it this way? ::minor daughter:: showering/locker room with ::(adult) men::

I find your statement confusing because If students are sharing locker rooms, presumably it is with peers of similar ages. So, why not frame the argument accurately as minor daughter v minor boy. Why introduce the false and emotionally loaded power dynamic of man/big vs. girl/small?

Regardless of your thought process, your point is complete bullshit.