Submitted by Significant_Guava881 t3_ytmc0p in vermont
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_iw5rtkz wrote
Reply to comment by hideous-boy in Rifle season starts this weekend. A reminder to wear orange. by Significant_Guava881
This exactly, unless you are on private property, with permission, or a dog park that is specifically marked as "off leash", you need to keep your dog on a leash in all public places.
Bibliophiliac1892 t1_iw7ezvr wrote
Something a lot of people who go to state parks blatantly disregard and then wonder why people get annoyed or why they get mad that their dog got injured. 🤔
Faerhun t1_iw83m9u wrote
Depends on the town as well, like Milton you don't need a leash, provided you have your dog under control.
For the people in the back, that means your dog is close to you and has a near perfect recall. Not is just friendly and will eventually will back..
>other appropriate means so that at all times the dog can be prevented from causing any damage, disturbance or annoyance."
Voice control is absolutely legal.
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_iw8my71 wrote
This is true in a few places, however, while a few towns do allow you to control your animal by verbal means, the language is usually much more restrictive than simply having perfect recall and will usually state that the animal must remain at a heel by your side unless being actively used for hunting or law enforcement activities.
Also, Milton Vermont is not one of those places, you must keep your dogs on a leash in public in the town of Milton. Here is the actual language:
"Section 4 Dog Running at Large/And Or Unlicensed
a. A person who owns, harbors, keeps or controls a dog(s) shall not allow a dog to run at large
off his/her premises on any public or private property"
"Section 3 Definition:
c. "At Large" shall mean off the premises of the owner and not under the control of the owner or member of his/her immediate family or agent of the owner, either by leash, cord, chain or other
appropriate means so that at all times the dog can be prevented from causing any damage, disturbance or annoyance."
[deleted] t1_iw8pnj2 wrote
[deleted]
Faerhun t1_ixw6m66 wrote
So rereading this it even says
>other appropriate means so that at all times the dog can be prevented from causing any damage, disturbance or annoyance."
Which has its own sub section. So I was right, I even asked the town again. By voice control is absolutely fine.
Had a different conversation that made me think of this.
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_ixwpp1m wrote
No, you were wrong and just suck at reading comprehension
[deleted] t1_iw8khgf wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments