Submitted by Northwoods01 t3_10l5cbl in vermont
HardTacoKit t1_j5upzn2 wrote
More like “Common Sense Being Considered in Vermont”
Thank God we are addressing gun control issues that the rest of the Country is ignoring. It’s sad and sickening to the victims of the (seemingly) weekly mass shootings that we aren’t doing more.
happyonthehill802 t1_j5uu5kp wrote
Not common sense at all. We have very little gun violence. Open carry is silly to remove when we have constitutional carry, the only people walking around with rifles are hunters during hunting season...guess i cant walk along the side of the road after finishing up in the woods now?
10 day waiting period is fine, the rest are obsurd.
[deleted] t1_j5uwzjb wrote
[deleted]
happyonthehill802 t1_j5vjpvd wrote
Listen, if people want to kill themselves, as tragic as it is, theyre going to do it. Id rather a clean bullet to the head, than forcing some poor volunteer to carry my body out of the quechee gorge...
As far as self defense, generally not needed in my neck of the woods...nope. my rifles are locked in a safe waiting for hunting season. However as a child free, responsible gun owner, i see no reason that someone can dictate where my guns live...the rifle that used to sit next to my bed at my old house, never committed any crimes, or made its way into the wrong hands...
Furthermore, vermont has been historically very lax on guns, if you dont want to live in a state like that, my personal advice would be to move to Massachusetts or ny.
syphax t1_j5x6foz wrote
>Listen, if people want to kill themselves, as tragic as it is, theyre going to do it. Id rather a clean bullet to the head, than forcing some poor volunteer to carry my body out of the quechee gorge...
This is not a true statement. Some suicide is pre-meditated, but *a lot* is not- look at people who attempted suicide once and then did not repeat. It is generally not a methodical and rationale act.
And your second sentence contradicts your first; you basically admit that guns lower the threshold and make it easier to commit suicide.
[deleted] t1_j5vngcu wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j5v75bo wrote
[removed]
xxxDog_Fucker_69xxx t1_j5vt439 wrote
Half of Vermont households own at least one firearm. Guns laws and legal ownership aren’t the problem, it’s the people perpetrating and committing crimes.
HappilyhiketheHump t1_j5urrid wrote
Yeah, cause mass shooters follow laws. smh
[deleted] t1_j5us084 wrote
Take the murder laws off the books then. Only criminals follow them after all
TheJesterScript t1_j65zhlm wrote
How is that a logical response to that statement?
I get tired explaining this. His point is more laws restricting/banning firearms won't stop it.
[deleted] t1_j66ek24 wrote
You don’t know what logic means, do you?
TheJesterScript t1_j66iuz1 wrote
I do. Clearly, you do not.
[deleted] t1_j66pwsj wrote
Get your childhood home tested for lead
TheJesterScript t1_j66vuju wrote
Not enough lead in a while neighborhood to make me say something that stupid.
_foxmotron_ t1_j5v49kn wrote
So we should legalize all drugs then?
Howard_Scott_Warshaw t1_j5v88ie wrote
I think you're starting to get it. If heroin were legal tomorrow, would you start shooting up?
Who won the war on drugs? The US, or drugs?
Belastin t1_j5ve4o6 wrote
Honestly yes?
Treat it like it is, a health problem. If you’re an addict why not just give them the real deal. All they’re going to do is find an alternative that is 90% more harmful to their health.
joeydokes t1_j5wk6np wrote
Man, I so wish people in charge would get that message!
Legalize all drugs, eliminate the criminality from the addiction and treat it as the health problem it is.
Make opium (smoke it) and coca (chew it) available at medicinal/rec head shops and track it like pot.
Pay off-duty cops to deliver heroin to serious junkies; free and conditional to getting weekly counseling.
Sounds crazy, I know; but anything that breaks the cycle of addiction->crime and lightens the burden on the courts/police has to stop making too much sense!
(Or, ... follow the $)
_foxmotron_ t1_j5vek53 wrote
whispers I agree, but I like to see the mental gymnastics people put themselves through to explain why it’s different.
joeydokes t1_j5wkgmf wrote
Yes. Sadly there's too much ill gotten gain at stake for that to ever happen.
Money is what's preventing it more than it being a bad idea.
HardTacoKit t1_j5uv4h3 wrote
OK, well I’m sure your “thoughts and prayers” will work soon. Let’s do nothing and hope they do (While every other fucking country in the world doesn’t have this problem because of their effective gun control laws).
HappilyhiketheHump t1_j5v6gjc wrote
Please list the gun laws that criminals are currently following. I’ll wait.
Belastin t1_j5vdwd2 wrote
You’re right let’s ban guns and get all 800 million off the streets. Seems like a totally reasonable and doable undertaking.
Also since I put up my no trespassing and no stealing signs on my property all crime has magically stopped! I’m so glad the goverment made stealing illegal, now there will be no more theft ever
joeydokes t1_j5wja49 wrote
Those countries w/out GV, or much violence in general, have much stronger social safety nets. Our country was F'in built on guns and violence (and drugs). The same "I come first" attitude that permits billionaires to decide our future.
Inner city GV (+addictions) is a reflection of 100yrs of repression that's only recently (40yrs) spread into burbs and hinterland. A "War on Guns" is going to resemble our "War on Drugs"; reinforcing and militarizing the police State.
Consistent-Raccoon42 t1_j5uyuo5 wrote
I wouldn't say every country. I mean there's Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yema just to name a few.
I'm all for a longer waiting period. However, the idea that taking away guns from everyone will not help us.
TheJesterScript t1_j65z6je wrote
None of this would do anything to stop a mass shooting...
TheTowerBard t1_j5vq3ft wrote
Amen.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments