Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

pyroracing85 t1_j6l2rvp wrote

Product sits on the shelf on sale in my local supermarket.

45

Rameist2 t1_j6l3pwk wrote

It will only survive off niche places needing to offer vegetarian options. Like sports and entertainment venues.

4

driverdevin t1_j6l3u44 wrote

It’s prohibitively expensive in my area

109

Zetice t1_j6l3yo2 wrote

why didnt you post this yesterday?

0

Mega-Lithium t1_j6l6jxd wrote

How can that be???

I personally bought an impossible Whopper at Burger King that one time around 2 years ago (I think)

20

SateliteDicPic t1_j6l6k5y wrote

That’s an improvement over where I live where people just sneer in its general direction.

Chanos said today he thinks they don’t have enough cash to finish out the year.

ETA: I’m a regarded degenerate that can’t tell one plant based “meat” product business with a hyperbolic name from the other one.

5

ch4m4njheenga t1_j6laaix wrote

My company cafeteria sells the burger for $5. It’s a steal compared to McD or Burger King.

−2

mxk2020 t1_j6laucj wrote

If I was a billionaire I would buy farmland to support meat based vegetables so normal carnivores no longer have to be stigmatized by obedient worshipers of MyPlate.

−2

nomorerainpls t1_j6lduq9 wrote

In my city Impossible is treated an an untested upgrade both in terms of quality, health, climate and price. I don’t think this message has landed yet with fast food connoisseurs

6

Free-Public-Wifi t1_j6llnz8 wrote

According to Family Guy John Wayne ate steak for breakfast, lunch, and dinner; makes sense considering he had over 40 lbs of impacted fecal matter during his autopsy. Calls on impacted fecal matter and enlarged colons due to less plant based meats being consumed.

−4

darkspd96 t1_j6lmcxl wrote

Well when 80/20 ground beef is $2.5/lb, vs impossible at $6/lb... I know what I'm getting everytime

If they could undercut I'd buy it everytime!!

71

Mogar700 t1_j6lrzcn wrote

I am vegetarian. When I eat out at restaurants I am looking for vegetarian options that do NOT taste like meat. Why would someone be a vegetarian and be looking to eat food made to taste like meat is beyond me

11

arctic_bull t1_j6m0iq3 wrote

Sodium isn't really an issue for most people, and personally I disagree. I think it tastes good. Definitely has a bit of a pea smell. I order it over a beige paste made of as many as 100 to 1000 cattle if I'm out at a fast food place. Won't replace a steak of course.

Let's face it most ground meat in the US by volume is shit, bottom tier stuff. Nobody would notice if it got swapped out at a Taco Bell.

−12

Dry_Inflation_861 t1_j6m0utc wrote

I'm so tired of panda express asking if I want to try their beyond orange chicken. I don't even know if it's the same company I just don't fucking want it. Give me that delicious goodness I've been eating since I was a child. I really wish it was acceptable to tell them to fuck off nicely, I'm not and will never be interested.

1

out2seeagain t1_j6m8p2y wrote

I have never understood how someone that doesn’t eat meat, would want to eat something that’s pretending to be meat.

6

BeerPizzaGaming t1_j6mcwcb wrote

Glorified veggie burgers that are less healthy that actual meat and cost more than twice as much.

17

CalyShadezz t1_j6md27k wrote

I remember when the Impossible Whopper came out and people were like "Finally, I can eat at Burger King!". Like fuck man, I only go to Burger King when I was in a pinch...how many Vegans were driving past Burger Kings getting sad before the Imposible Whopper?

53

BeerPizzaGaming t1_j6md7tb wrote

Taco bell "meat" is the lowest grade allowed for human consumption and only a fraction of the substance identified as meat comes from beef muscle. Their "meat" products have a shit ton of cellulose powder (horse hair and tree pulp) mixed in it and they admit that 12% of the volume is "spices." What is that BS? There is no need for that much spice.

17

SproutedWinkle t1_j6n251k wrote

Our company is literally called impossible and you keep buying??????

1

DudeRick t1_j6n250d wrote

Think of all of the vegetable lives that will be saved…

6

ZebraheadedGuy t1_j6n6zos wrote

Have you ever tried J Kenji Lopez-Alt’s recipe for black bean burgers? It’s phenomenal. My family loves meat and we make that recipe once a month. He bakes the beans first to dry them out and it totally improves the texture and flavor.

7

aKnightWh0SaysNi t1_j6n9mip wrote

It takes a gold medal in mental gymnastics to arrive a place where raising something for the sole purpose of killing and eating it is ethical if you’re nice to them first, but not if you’re mean to them before the murdering.

−7

Cryptic0677 t1_j6nakx2 wrote

I’m not saying it’s optimal and imo we should all resolve to eat less or no meat, but if we’re gonna do it we definitely shouldn’t lock animals in cages and or let them walk all over and shit on each other

2

doobiedoobie123456 t1_j6nedlw wrote

That's too bad, I think Impossible burgers taste pretty decent. And they are way more ethical and environmentally friendly than conventional beef.

0

LC7325 t1_j6nkxlt wrote

Fake meat is possible, profits are the impossible part.

5

lovsicfrs t1_j6nntrl wrote

The part that kills me is like…

You’re going to go eat at a place that still profits off slaughtering animals and using their remains as food for everyone else going there? As a vegan, shouldn’t you be against any establishment that practices this? Wild.

3

Federal-Artichoke-73 t1_j6nqr7h wrote

Actually, if you drive up the sales of Impossible Whopper vs animal meat, the wise business decision is to increase consumption of the former thus driving down demand for meat. The outcome is that fewer animals are killed. Win

17

lovsicfrs t1_j6nvk3n wrote

I think it’s different when it’s good being cooked Vs food you are purchasing to take home to your own cooking environment.

You are assuming that the same cooking utensils are not being used and as someone who has worked fast food, good luck!

0

Thanmandrathor t1_j6nx77z wrote

I avoid fast food as a general rule, it’s literally my last food option when nothing else is available.

But both places bring in meat to sell onto consumers and profit off doing so, so I think claiming that as the reason to avoid fast food as a vegan is a bit of a stretch.

I also made no assumptions about how stuff is cooked in a fast food place, I merely pointed out that both places profit off selling meat.

I do in fact eat vegan. I am also under no illusion that staff in a fast food, or any other restaurant that isn’t solely plant-based for that matter, are going to cross-contaminate the foods, because they either don’t give enough of a shit, or are too stupid to know better. As I have no allergies the cross-contamination is not a huge issue for me personally. If I eat at a BK it would be a calculated risk at that point.

3

TRBigStick t1_j6nyaeq wrote

I can’t speak to the average person because I’m on WSB and thus below average intelligence.

I do, however, know that the federal government creates massive market inefficiencies in farming, healthcare, pharma, and higher education.

6

pingforhelp t1_j6o6ga5 wrote

No lol this only holds true if an already existing animal meat consumer switches to impossible

If a fresh vegan who is not already a bk customer goes and gets an impossible whopper than it doesn't change their demand of animal meat at all and no less animals are slaughtered.

A fresh vegan should avoid bk at all costs because the only way to reduce the number of animals slaughtered is if the business disappears and by giving them any money at all you are preventing that

−2

ATHSE t1_j6o7qet wrote

I'm waiting for 100% layoffs.

1

Me_Melissa t1_j6oettn wrote

Purchasing the impossible option in large numbers would keep it on the menu longer, normalizing it and enticing many to try it at least once. That would lower the cultural barrier to entry for any meat substitute, which helps the concept's viability. That would be a very long play.

8

_BreakingGood_ t1_j6oggtj wrote

As a person with common sense, I genuinely wonder if people really think it could ever be cheaper to raise a fucking cow to slaughter than grow some soybeans.

It's not cheaper, you're just pre-paying for it with your taxes

2

_BreakingGood_ t1_j6ogxf5 wrote

Impossible was never about the animals. That might be priority number 30 on their list of top 30 priorities.

An impossible burger takes something like 99% less water, 90% less power, generates 99% less emissions, results in 99% less deforestation (much of the beef industry is deforesting the amazon rainforest too which is even worse.)

The goal was always environmental, not so much animal welfare.

4

_BreakingGood_ t1_j6ohal3 wrote

It makes more sense when you realize what problem it was actually trying to solve.

Animal farming produces about 16% of global emission each year. That means about 1/6th of every pollutant released this year was because of animal farming.

The impossible burger is in a solid 90% reduction of power usage, water usage, land usage, emissions, deforestation.

Their goal isn't to make a healthy burger. Not at all.

−1

Heatbeat t1_j6ozii2 wrote

Really? Then what did they evolve to do? Calculus?

If they're not supposed to be food then why do predators exist equipped to prey on them?

Fact is cows are a high yield food source and that's why they're so relied upon.

And you said it wasn't about the animals, which, it CLEARLY is.

0

lovsicfrs t1_j6p46ky wrote

They shouldn’t but what do I know. Kind of weird to have such a hard stance because of acts you don’t agree with but then actively put money into the pockets of those who benefit from said acts and continue on with them.

0