Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

No-Owl9201 t1_iug9l6v wrote

The best news for the Amazon, Climate Change and Democracy, I heard for along while!!!!!!!!!

45

SurpriseImpressive54 t1_iuih9ta wrote

Maybe, but the like of Macron support Lula, and that french dude wants to internationalize the Amazon to "protect", we ALL know they Just want the resources for them.

2

[deleted] t1_iugxmsk wrote

[removed]

−26

No-Owl9201 t1_iuh1e9h wrote

Yep, I'm so gullible I already know the history and the actual figures.. though of course I'm sure you know much better than (so called) experts..

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_of_the_Amazon_rainforest

30

[deleted] t1_iuh1lz5 wrote

[removed]

−13

No-Owl9201 t1_iuh2a8u wrote

You need help reading?

https://learnenglishkids.britishcouncil.org/reading-practice

26

[deleted] t1_iuh37qi wrote

[removed]

−7

No-Owl9201 t1_iuh5851 wrote

Pity your confirmation biase, means you didn't read the entire list.

15

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iuitrvd wrote

1- it's not my information

2- I gave you the link , you are the one who is not looking at numbers

3- you are just a fanatic who is denying numbers blatantly because they don't agree with you

0

All_I_See_Is_Teeth t1_iuhn63a wrote

Deforestation rates plummeted pretty much the second Lula walked in. The data is so simple to read a toddler could do It.

You're bad at this whole misinformation thing.

14

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iuiroav wrote

so how do you account for :

2003 total loss 25,396 km2

2004 total loss 27,772 km2

Apply that logic here please , and explain it to me how is that plummeted the second he walked in ?

Data is so simple and , you don't / can't even read yet calling me toddler

0

All_I_See_Is_Teeth t1_iujl3cp wrote

You. Are a fucking toddler.

This is government. Shit doesn't happen at the snap of a finger. The data is clear.

1

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iujotr2 wrote

I am giving you stats

Deforestation of Lula's term is more than the double of Bolsonaro's term of deforestation , first two years consistently increasing , how's that the "second he walked in plummeted" for an argument?

Data is clear is the only part I can agree with you ! you should look at it sometimes

When you start name calling someone, it's a sign of losing an argument , what a loser .... hahahaa

0

All_I_See_Is_Teeth t1_iujwar1 wrote

Oh you're definitely giving false and misleading stats

The numbers you seem to love throwing in people's faces don't hold up past the first glance. 2 entire terms of decreasing deforestation and yet you think people are stupid enough to look at your numbers and not be able to immediatley see the truth?

They're higher because he came into power when deforestation was at an all time high. You're the exact same kind of person who argues Obama dropped more bombs than trump. Yeah. No shit. Double the time and way more combat during Said time.

The arguement you so desperately prop up is made of paper. Its over. Lula won. Youve lost. You're either a bot or You're paid to do this.

1

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iuk68yu wrote

Let's just say for a second that I am misleading
There is something called fact checking , you can always google rates and see yourself , nobody is stopping you
Here is a link for you , unless you claim I invented Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_in_Brazil?fbclid=IwAR2NlH3GqYRlde70XofgAHJNYuujsG3YuyyLwIl-Fdb6gqojTwvmgOxAd0k#Rates

1

All_I_See_Is_Teeth t1_iukar76 wrote

Yes, yes dodge the rebuttal and present the same information with your misleading narrative.

How much do you make doing this?

1

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iukbbdc wrote

Exposing mindless fanatics , watching them crumble with facts , seeing them not having arguments and consorting name callings is priceless , it gives me immense pleasure

It not my information , it's not my chart , just pure facts you can't stand

1