Submitted by ooooopsoooooo t3_z1a3fi in worldnews
Comments
SEBii_fan_999 t1_ix9xq4l wrote
YEAH I WONDER HOW
gaukonigshofen t1_ix9zt4w wrote
not sure about everywhere, but in south east USA, its next to impossible to buy a car. wait is like 30-45 days minimum
Inevitable_Permit_69 t1_ixa0nf4 wrote
I put a order in for a ioniq 5 in Ontario, wait time is 2 years lol
SortaWrong t1_ixa4iv7 wrote
Human pods?
mhornberger t1_ixa5y43 wrote
We already needed to to do that anyway. In either case the share of electricity from low-carbon sources is steadily increasing, driven primarily by renewables. At the moment about 90% of new capacity is just solar and wind. Which are also very fast to deploy. Yes, I know, this is Reddit, so "what about nuclear?" We've heard of it. New nuclear is too expensive and slow to deploy.
postsshortcomments t1_ixa7bc0 wrote
What do you fine as a "large amount" of electricity when it comes to non-fossil fuels? 15%? 25%?
anavriN-oN t1_ixabgzt wrote
Nuclear.
Myjunkisonfire t1_ixaftk5 wrote
Anything under 2 months is a cake walk. Aussies here waiting 12months+ for new orders.
gaukonigshofen t1_ixajdnl wrote
you guys spend all of your time doing walkabouts. no need for a car lol
Chairman_Mittens t1_ixambzr wrote
Hamster wheel power.
[deleted] t1_ixbesco wrote
[deleted]
Cortical t1_ixbk86u wrote
same here in Quebec
vgf89 t1_ixbzjq5 wrote
Yeah nuclear is great and probably would be the most efficient way to go carbon neutral... But on time and within budget nuclear plant construction is not
Tim_Allosaurus t1_ixc58it wrote
If only we NU a better solution. It would be so nice if the answer was CLEAR
Longjumping_Meat_138 t1_ixch5zk wrote
Theoretically a nuclear world is possible, Practically it's hard and improbable
kmurph72 t1_ix9wdfc wrote
This is great news, except that we need to figure out how to make large amounts of electricity without natural gas and coal.