Submitted by Beckles28nz t3_10004rz in worldnews
mycall t1_j2ez19u wrote
How would a F-35 handle a swarm of drones?
1975kilroy t1_j2f0r8z wrote
With speed and altitude. It is substantially faster than current drones. And if armed enough it can in turn shoot down the drones.
Myrdok t1_j2fw5s2 wrote
This plus not being detected at all by said drones then blowing up the operating station from over the horizon with an air to ground loadout.
paskahuussi89 t1_j2f65r4 wrote
If you have 200 of drones in air, a F-35 can reduce the amount to perhaps 196 with cost of $12,000,000.
It's easier and cheaper to let them fly near the target and then let radar controlled AA autocannons and short range missiles take them down. A few of them might break up enroute if you let them fly further.
CompetitiveYou2034 t1_j2fn8t2 wrote
Repeat of lesson learned with Air Force interceptors in Vietnam, which were originally only equipped with air-to-air missiles. Then they faced Russian Migs in actual combat. Guns were added!
Moral: A true multi-role fighter must have a gun.
Future: A gun can fire a short burst at each drone. Very economical.
Add computer auto control and off-axis shooting, and the fighter can fly past a flock of drones, downing them all.
Mirathecat22 t1_j2frrm9 wrote
F-35 does have a gun, it’s just the B and C variant that don’t. B, because the lift fan takes up the space where a lot of the gun would be and C I’m not too sure about tbh.
Devourer_of_felines t1_j2fxla1 wrote
Modern fighters don’t carry nearly enough ammo for their Gatling guns for more than a handful of short bursts.
If you really need an airborne anti drone plane you’re probably better off mounting an auto cannon on a turret on the belly of an old bomber airframe.
[deleted] t1_j2f1q20 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments