>Dina saying she anything about elections is meaningless. It's Congress that can decide when the elections are.

And they already moved them to 2024. This was voted on last month.

>That still doesn't mean that the mass protests going on today is just "a riot".

Well whatever you want to call it, it still isn’t going to determine the Presidency. Protest activity in one region doesn’t overrule the duly elected government of all of Peru.

>In the last few weeks there have been riots,

OK, well, I wasn’t just talking about this protest today, but the whole movement when I said that.

>So once again, you said "Peru isn’t letting a riot determine the Presidency" and I find that disingenuous.

Why are you jumping to disingenuous? If you think I’m wrong call me wrong, but going after my motives seems unwarranted.