AbsentEmpire

AbsentEmpire t1_j6nnzea wrote

I understand where you're coming from now, and I agree, we'd be better off without the window dressing of OTIS. All they do currently is give cover for our shitty elected officials to continue doing the same bullshit they've always done with our dangerous street design.

4

AbsentEmpire t1_j6nnc7q wrote

My hot take is that a 14 year old armed car jacker is in fact a danger to society, and should be sent to juvenile prison. They should not be allowed to continue terrorizing and attacking members of society solely because of their age.

Regardless the people involved in car jackings do tend to be older than 14.

45

AbsentEmpire t1_j6nifup wrote

OTIS can literally do nothing without district councilman explicitly approving the street design.

Which in practice makes them a total waste of time and tax payer money because of council interference in street engineering designs.

Same goes for multiple city departments, which might as well be scraped because council members block any changes or improvements from happening so as to hold the city back and protect thier elected positions.

7

AbsentEmpire t1_j6n5lcx wrote

These deaths fall entirely on negligence of City Council members actively blocking OTIS from redesigning the streets because God forbid a driver be inconvenced for even a second. Along with our drunk oaf of a mayor and incompetent and lazy police department who are never held to account for not doing thier jobs.

47

AbsentEmpire t1_j6n40ej wrote

Most of the bike lanes in this city are so bad they might as well not exist in practice.

I find biking in the suburbs to actually be safer most of the time because the streets are so wide cars pass you with enough space.

Drivers are also held to a higher degree of accountability in burbs since the cops there actually enforce traffic laws.

Worst case you can bike on the sidewalks and use them as a properly designed separated bike lane, because no fat ass in the suburbs walks, so they're always empty.

8

AbsentEmpire t1_j6kmcxq wrote

Sadly I only just saw this pop up on my feed, thanks for doing the AMA, and I will listen to your show tomorrow.

If you're still answering questions, will you be covering other statues/ monuments in the city on the future, such as the fellows around city hall, or a summary of all the Franklin statues throughout the city?

Mods please sticky the AMA threads in future so we all see them in time.

1

AbsentEmpire t1_j6hwlnw wrote

The violence prevention grants to non-profits with zero oversight is the new envelope full of cash corruption Philly politics is known for. The lack of oversight is intentional, it's not a fluke.

Money should not be sent to non profits to provide government services. If the government is going to run a program it should be through the city government, and subject to oversight and audits.

5

AbsentEmpire t1_j5v308t wrote

Great endorsement, Street was broadly popular in the city despite his corruption. He also implemented the neighborhood improvement program which was and still is a broadly popular program with residents who remember it.

This also helps her get name recognition in communities she has weak recognition in, and access to the political network Street built up in North Philly.

If she can get Nutter that will do the same thing to boost her in West Philly.

3