Academic_Peanut4232
Academic_Peanut4232 t1_j90yxyf wrote
Reply to comment by Felaguin in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
And? I don't see what anything you said has to do with anything I said.
Academic_Peanut4232 t1_j90on01 wrote
Reply to comment by Felaguin in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
>There is no dispute about being able control our national airspace at 60,000 feet.
That's not true. It's still face that no one knows what the "UAPs" are/ were. There's stuff flying around that comes from above 80,000 feet into the detection-edge of Earth-based radars and then breaks the laws of physics lol. No one knows what those things are, and no one can "control" our airspace from them. What astounds me is that those things exist, and we're not dumping tons of money trying to figure out what they are and how they fly. Imagine where our space program could be if they made a serious effort at doing that lol.
Academic_Peanut4232 t1_j94q94v wrote
Reply to comment by Felaguin in Where does space really begin? Chinese spy balloon highlights legal fuzziness of ‘near space’ by HarpuasGhost
We couldn't even track balloons until 2 weeks ago. There are/ were balloons flying all around our airspace, and we didn't even know about balloon until a few years ago.
So all the sudden, the things that pilots have been reporting seeing for decades, it makes sense there's no (publicly available) data on that stuff. If we can't even track balloons until recently, how could we track alien spacecraft? Or -- maybe we could/ can, but just like balloons, it was filtered out or some other reason we aren't/ didn't interpret the data correctly?
If something did actually fly into Earth from space, accelerating to ridiculous speeds and breaking the laws of physics -- would that data be looked into, or would it just be ignored as "anomalous" like the balloons were for decades?