This is white guy on white woman crime. Gtfo with your systemic racism crap. Use that on the threads about how test scores went down....

Now sit down...

It's drives me nuts when people say that. Because it's usually true

But you're an axe murderer. How are you even allowed internet rights?

Just look at the last three times.... not that hard...

Do tell how...

You're cracking me up! Stop it lol. Roflmao. Hahahaha

Wow you really can't read that stuff huh. It says clearly under his convictions. But you want to defend him. Police arresting the wrong man? Wow. Lol. Omg im laughing really hard right now reading this lol. Seriously stop roflmao. Too damn funny

Keep defending a bad guy lol. Go ahead....

Roflmao, arrest the wrong man who was clearly with his victim when police showed up lol. Omfg....

I'm rolling....

Thanks for the laugh

Gaslight how?

I am sharing the information with you of this gentleman's history. I respect you may be busy. I respect you want to give him due dilligence. If, after providing you with all there is, you still don't see what's wrong here, that's fine.

I am not the reason why innocent men are in person. I am just trying to avoid another tragedy based on ones repeat offenses against protective orders, and their history of domestic abuse. Both of which this gentleman has clearly demonstrated based solely on actions.

Also, here is what happened in CA.

1 year of anger management. Domestic abuse charge. Recidivism is real here:

https://drblookupportal.judiciary.state.nj.us/DocumentHandler.ashx?document_id=1099392

Hmm.... violating a condition of release.... arrest date July 18, 2018, and judging by the articles, that was incident where they arrested him for sending harassing messages to the victim. All kinda makes sense to me.....

But you do you. I can put two and two together....

Look up Neil S Bhatia on Google. You will see the string of arrests he had, starting in 2018. You can search the court records if you choose (I did), but its quite confusing between his conviction of violating a protective order, and the slew of pending cases he has against him.

https://www.google.com/search?q=neil+s+bhatia&rlz=1C1EJFC_enUS986US986&oq=neil+s+bh&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59j0i22i30l3j69i60l3.7048j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

I have the day off, so I searched this. But dont just take it from me. Here is a link to the court website (you may need to input his name):

https://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/parm1.aspx

I am all for due process. its our right. But I am also a firm believer that if you violate the laws (depending on the severity), we need to be careful to allow you a third try.

Great. Wonderful. I don't care. Lamont signed Jennifers law. WTF is your point?

You think this guy still deserves to walk. I ask, why? If you had a protective order against you, would you continue to violate it after your first arrest? Would you continue sending harassing messages to the person who doesn't want you to contact them? Would you?

I just did deal with the opinion. I said sit down. Now sit down. Let the adults handle this. Dont like it, scroll on.... I am sure there are other posts you can attempt to hijack with the systemic racism bullshit that may make more sense (like the dropping test scores in CT schools)....

Peace...

Fine. you got me. politicians make laws. Domestic abuse was addressed with Jennifers law. But why wasn't it addressed here?

Ive done research on it. I have reviewed what they were pushing (shifting from throw them in jail to providing social safety nets). I do agree with aspects of it. But this doesn't apply here. This isn't some dude from Bridgeport who was raised without a father. This is an educated male, who is well off in his $10,000 a month apartment in an affluent neighborhood. This can potentially be a repeat of Jennifer Dulos. It needs to stop.

Yes discussion on domestic abuse, and what sort of consequences there are for it. If a commenter is going to hijack to push crap on social inequality and systemic racism, I will push back. It is irrelevant to this case, and I wont entertain that nonsense here. They can start another thread if they choose.

You can take a seat too...

While I should be thankful that this guy was taken into custody, and no one was hurt, I am a bit angered at the possibility this guy can go on a rampage and potentially hurt the victim more.

Legislators did pass Jennifer Law last year. But its not enough in my opinion. And other users have brought up good points (custody battles, he-said/she-said, etc). But any reasonable guy would know not to violate a protective/restraining order. This guy has done it three times, and its concerning.

Ill apologize my vulgarity. I wont apologize for avoiding making this a political statement. You and I both acknowledge a potential flaw. lets address it with our legislators.

And here we go.......

Push your propaganda elsewhere.

Let the adults care for the victims of domestic abuse. Now sit down....

Isnt the leniency on juvenile offenders a result of ideas like yours? And hasnt that amounted more crime by juveniles? So much so, Lamont and legislators had to pass a law making repeat offenders subject to stricter punishment?

Seems my idea has worked better than yours in the past.

After first time, perhaps. But now you are endangering the safety of the victim and the children. This is the mindset that has lead us to where we are today.

Your idea does not work.

Yeah thats my issue. Thanks for repeating it...m

Nor is letting someone violating a protective order 3x out to potentially kill or harm their victim more.....

Sorry this doesn't fly with me. Domestic abuse is not good, and if it involves kids, who knows if this will turn into the next Jennifer dulos....

Bet you forgot about that one.....

After violating the protective orders three times, you're not seeing an issue here?

Ok.....

Yeah took a cop out....

C ya

Look up the court records. I don't know who sets bail. All I know is this dude has continously violates a protective order, allegedly assaulted the victim, and who knows what else, and is still released. It's wrong.

And I got some ass clown saying "vote red" or "it's democrats faults" without providing one shred of evidence.

I'm not making this political. I'm making this right v wrong.