After violating the protective orders three times, you're not seeing an issue here?

Ok.....

Yeah took a cop out....

C ya

Look up the court records. I don't know who sets bail. All I know is this dude has continously violates a protective order, allegedly assaulted the victim, and who knows what else, and is still released. It's wrong.

And I got some ass clown saying "vote red" or "it's democrats faults" without providing one shred of evidence.

I'm not making this political. I'm making this right v wrong.

Here we go. I know what the answer is, but who should I vote for governor?

On the contrary. I think after the second time this should have been handled swiftly. Stop allowing perps to continually violate protective orders....

Ok. Both very good points. He was found guilty in 2020 of violation of condition of release. He was sentenced to jail for 1 year (but execution suspended).

He also had a protective order in California.

Tbh. The ct system is kinda screwy. He also seems to have pending cases too from an incident in 2020....

Point is, it seems to be repetitive and potentially a bigger issue. Imo, any level headed dude will not be going through this nonsense. Courts come in and settle this crap. Unless you tell me there's an issue with family courts (which wouldn't surprise me).

I'm just having flashbacks to Jennifer dulos...

Ah. You mean the perp lies. Fortunately I have not witnessed firsthand. I did have a friend who went through it. Hence why this pisses me off

He has repeatedly harassed this victim. Since 2018.

What more do you want? It's called recidivism.

I can't disagree there. May have been overboard.

This was the third time.

Or do you want to wait until the victim dies or is seriously hurt next time?

Lied three times? No. There is a problem here....

Or do you want to wait until the victim dies to address it?

What the fuck are you talking about? This guy was able to post bail three times in the past.

Stop with the fucking politics. There's a bigger problem here. Doesn't matter what side you are on .

I did find that part kind of funny lol

I've had that experience with plenty of republicans....

Well that needs to change, doesn't it?

75k bond in 2018...

https://dailyvoice.com/connecticut/westport/police-fire/westport-man-charged-with-harassment-after-restaurant-residence-incidents/733219/

Then he did it again in July of 2018.

This is not liberal vs conservative. This is a failure of CT legal system. And needs to be addressed. Take your shitty politics elsewhere.

I think its meteor showers through december

I dont know. I am in CT.

Roflmao!!!! Omg. I'm surprised it took three paragraphs to get to the nazi reference lol.

I needed a good chuckle. Thank you.

This reminds me if 2016. And the democrats failures to address this sooner is bothersome to me. GOP has gotten a lot of momentum. Unfortunately their lies and deceit are being absorbed by their followers, and no one is questioning their solutions. In my district, they are pushing on rising crime and parental rights. Yet they have no solutions, but people are biting and getting hooked. It's scary...

My thoughts exactly. And I'm hoping for fucks sake not a real one is happening

Republicans in Greenwich and Fairfield have refused to join debates.....

Want to talk about sad trends? You can start with Republicans.....

They need to address that part of the act, about qualified immunity. Local police forces are being pansy asses about it.

Any profession you are not safe from being sued personally. But it's simple. Don't be a dick, you won't be sued. The police forces seem to think if they look at someone the wrong way, they'll get sued. That's not the intent of the removal of qualified immunity. However the law should be more clearer. What counts as negligence?

Diesel tax was put in by Republicans. Not Lamont. This is aggravating