AhbabaOooMaoMao

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j6fhwm9 wrote

Is 100,000 a significant number of chickens? I met a person that worked at this farm one time. Told me he was a chicken farmer. I said I have a flock myself, I have about ten, how many do you have? He said 3,000,000. Not sure how big of a loss a hunny bun of hens is if you've got twenty nine more.

The local fire inspector will certainly investigate, maybe the state inspector, too? I read that the State Department of Agriculture is being briefed but is not investigating. I'd be interested if anyone knows when the state fire marshal's jurisdiction takes over from the town. 5he insurance company will inspect; the flock and building were probably insured.

E: UConn Extension says there are 5,000,000 chickens in CT at 240 farms.

4

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j68p7d3 wrote

I don't think such a general analogy really fits. It's more like I've witnessed not one car accident, but dozens of the same kind of car accident and hundreds of similar ones, and read the accident reports and autopsy reports, and also have degrees in each driving science and driving law.

1

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j66s8k3 wrote

Not yet. We've been hearing and reading and seeing and singing about police beating a black body to death while he begged for his mother, it feels like, every year for decades. Just not sure I need more videos to visualize the story, after reading some of tonight's reporting. I'll maybe read the arrest warrant and the ME report, like the others, maybe a judicial order, if something unexpected happens in court, I'll look for the video later to see if any of these piglets cry at their sentencing.

I think it's nice to see some unity in condemning police treatment toward certain men. I also think I know why for some people it's super easy, damn near convenient, to demand justice this time, otherwise I might ask what took so long? Nobody has to trip over themselves or even do one backflip for these five, just lit them up.

Makes me sad.

>Check out the message in a rough stylee The real criminals are the see-O-P You check for undercover and the one PD But just a mere Black man, them want check me Them check out me car for it shine like the sun But them jealous or them vexed cause them can't afford one

>Black people still slaves up 'til today But the Black police officer nah see it that way Him want a salary Him want it So he put on a badge and kill people for it

>My grandfather had to deal with the cops My great-grandfather dealt with the cops My great grandfather had to deal with the cops And then my great, great, great, great, when it's gonna stop?! Woop-woop, That's the sound of da police, that's the sound of the beast

  • KRS One (Knowledge Reins Supreme Over Nearly Everyone).

Smart dude, KRS.

−15

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j66hxtu wrote

That's interesting. So you think Veoh, VO, and Veo, are three separate tags for three separate taggers, with the third one possibly being like a crew or a meme or something?

I had assumed Veoh, VO, and Veo, was just variation of one tagger, for style, mood, and perhaps, I always thought, time. Figured it must be cool to have a nickname you can spell these different ways.

3

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j66fvpr wrote

I've thought a lot about this and I'm curious as to your reasons.

I think there are definitely some copycats. For example, the low effort Veo scratched into the clear plastic that overlays the LCD screen at a gas pump in Hartford. I might wager that all of those are plagiarists.

When it comes to the more moderate-effort stuff, such as on a utility pole or sign along a busy roadway, so intentionally and overtly scrawled upon our concrete jungle, I think it's almost entirely the real tagger. The ones that aren't "real" are one-time thrill seekers or petty vandals, acting on opportunity, without creativity to think of anything else to write.

The ones up on bridges and the fully articulated ones all like V̷̶̘̻͔̟ͬ̋̇ͪͪ̑̓ȩ̷̵͎̘͎͙̹̺̮̈͆̓̋ͩ̌o̠̦͓̜̠̐͜͝ĥ̻̼̻̦̩̋ͫͬ̿ and stuff in full color, for someone else to do it, defeats the concept of tagging. And the risk of getting caught red handed as a notorious vandal of private, local, and state property, who would risk that but the true tagger?

I assume it's basically all the person does and definitely has help, maybe a couple of close family or crew, to drive, scout, and lookout. I assume the person has a job that requires them to be mobile throughout the region, and possibly works with said accomplices.

I find it amazing that someone has not been caught and charged with a significant amount of these. Shit I wonder if I can launch my own investigation and file a qui tam action against the person to recover the state's money, on its behalf, a fee for my time of course.

4

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j65ahso wrote

I've heard a handful of people say they've seen it in PR, maybe even one or two people said they saw it in Europe?

Veoh is prolific, I respect the commitment of the individual, and the timeless immutability of some from our species, when it comes to leaving their mark.

I hope each that he gets caught and never gets caught. I could be satisfied either way.

16

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j63vrn8 wrote

>I am educated. And had to correct the usage of delivery in my post. > >They do not profit on supply at all. Period. Nothing you can say "educate yourself" will change that. It is a fact.

At the end of the line, bud, it's the same richers that own the big chunks of shares of deliverers and suppliers. Integrated investing.

The solution to our Eversource problem js not fossil fuels. It is antitrust law and insider trading laws, both federal matters.

Anything else is just bandaids.

1

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j63vbbk wrote

I would think that if the officers or directors of Eversource moved the company to issue refunds to rate payers instead of dividends to shareholders, the shareholders would sue said officers or directors for breach of fiduciary duty.

This is the desolation of capitalism, one fat cat ends up with everything in the end, everyone else has starved or fled.

It requires a duty to owners, not to customers. What good is owning a store if there are no customers that can afford to shop there?

4