>So cops should punish more people.

For traffic violations? Absolutely. There is 0 enforcement and people just do whatever the fuck they want driving (and cycling) around here and it's dangerous

In that case, roller kingdom in Hudson is probably your best bet if you can get your hands on a car

>near Boston

You'll get more useful answers if you are a little more specific. Depending on where "near" is could end up being +/- an hour or two of commute to get to these places

I just picked a random spot right in the middle of London and looked at Publix transport times to Wembley and it was 50 minutes. Rounded it to about an hour. I'd imagine that time can swing a good 15+ minutes in either direction depending on where exactly in the center of town you are, but it doesn't feel too outrageous of a generalization

Both are about an hour from downtown by public transit, so it still stands to reason that a lot of Europeans won't be as blown away by the idea as everyone is suggesting.

>not one train route just one individual train

You'd have to be pretty dense to actually think they aren't going to increase service for the world cup

For the sake of sparking a little bit of discourse, this does seem like one of those classic cases of taking the worst case scenario, making a few favorable assumptions to make it even worse, and then publishing it as truth.

>“Up to 80% of emperor penguin colonies are projected to be quasi-extinct by 2100 [population declines of more than 90%] with business-as-usual increases in greenhouse gas emissions,” it found.

This sounds pretty bad at first glance, but the only sign of a mechanism behind the extinction is this quote:

>“The emperor penguin relies on ice for breeding,” Lee said. “If it loses its suitable breeding habitat … that can lead to [population] collapses over time.”

Without any other information, this just sounds like they are making a bit of a jump from "the ice will melt" straight to "they won't be able to figure out how to breed without the ice and they will all die"

That being said, there are more than enough good reasons to try to limit global warming, but this feels like a publication that was searching for the most extreme result possible.

I don't think you understand the difference between a staffing agency and a recruiter. Recruiters just find applicants for jobs. Staffing agencies are the ones you actually work for as an employee of the agency instead of the company you are doing work for.

>anything that moves

I'm not sure you fully understand how dead works

>Friday is the actual Earthshot Prize Awards Ceremony at the MGM Music Hall.

Honey, we gotta get bread, milk, and eggs! What if the royals want to stop by for french toast!?!

That's how it's supposed to work. You only need one post per a given story. Down vote the new one so people all comment on the same one

But they are also providing a very crucial service by providing grid access and maintaining the grid. If nobody paid for it's maintenance because everyone had solar, it would fail for everyone

>Because you get what amounts to a fine that goes directly to PG&E because youre not using all of their electricity.

Not really. They have to charge you differently because you are paying for the benefit of grid access (which 99% of people absolutely require), but no longer pay for it through electricity use like everyone else on the grid

I've noticed a few intersections where standing too close to the traffic lights/crossing signals will fuck with my Bluetooth on my headphones, could be something similar

That's what these sort of studies use as the neutral temperature for rodents.

You should be able to buy pretty much anything roasted locally if your frame of reference is trader Joe's coffee. It's not terrible, but most local stuff will be head and shoulders above it

Idk, when you are in your early 20s on Halloween, a crowded bar is a lot more fun than an empty one

Again, literally everyone else walks on the right side of the sidewalk, so don't be surprised when someone gets annoyed that you choose not to

Again, there aren't rules, but literally everyone here walks on the right side for the very obvious reason of making everyone safer and more predictable. I don't blame him at all for yelling at you to go on the side of the sidewalk that literally everyone else goes to

>But why should I move over

Because it's the normal neighborly thing to do.

>But I didn’t know if he was gonna go left or right

Because you weren't off to one side, so he also didn't know if you were going left or right.

>It’s not like there is a rule on sidewalk that runners have to stay to the right…

But clearly you can see how it would be beneficial to everyone's ability to efficiently share the sidewalk

I'm not saying no bike lanes, I'm saying sidewalk level bike lanes are not the best option for that area

A green roof can actually be beneficial. Doing it with a maintained turf lawn is not.

Because tourist (and everyone, realistically) are famously good at reading signs and following their instructions.

Yeah. Webster was backed up all the way to Cambridge st when I rode through on my bike last night around 6. The bus was nice enough to park themselves directly across the middle of the intersection with Cambridge st to block traffic in every direction