AriochQ t1_j25t7ah wrote on December 29, 2022 at 9:38 PM Reply to comment by [deleted] in How likely is it that Betelgeuse will supernova? by tempejkl Kepler’s Supernova was 1604. He is probably referring to the one from Chinese records in 185 A.D. EDIT: there are also a few from around 1000 AD that we’re visible to the naked eye. Permalink Parent 8
AriochQ t1_j25r7x0 wrote on December 29, 2022 at 9:24 PM Reply to comment by [deleted] in How likely is it that Betelgeuse will supernova? by tempejkl I think they were probably referring to visible with the naked eye. Permalink Parent 11
AriochQ t1_j25t7ah wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How likely is it that Betelgeuse will supernova? by tempejkl
Kepler’s Supernova was 1604. He is probably referring to the one from Chinese records in 185 A.D. EDIT: there are also a few from around 1000 AD that we’re visible to the naked eye.