Azr431

Azr431 t1_isfwk4n wrote

Thought it was pretty clearly implied standard meant daylight standard time but ok

People that advocate for daylight saving all year usually don’t see the forest for the trees. They don’t consider how it would impact the rest of the country, time shifting doesn’t operate in a vacuum and only affect NH. Sunset isn’t until almost 10pm in parts of the PNW and upper Midwest, it’s so weird going to bed with the sun still up and then it rises late in the morning. Then factor in world times and it’s more of a mess

Anyways this has sucked up more time than I care about it lol

1

Azr431 t1_isfqcew wrote

>You seem to have missed the point of my comment. Because switching is not healthy on our bodies, you should argue for keeping it the same all year.

That's literally what I wrote:

>Switching is not healthy for our bodies, it should remain standard all year.

The OP is not making an argument for time zone demarcations, they're arguing for retaining daylight saving all year. You'll always have variations between the farthest edges of one zone to the opposite edge of another. You'll also have a 1 hr difference between two areas right next to each other. There's simply no way around that.

The OP's argument would affect areas of different latitudes most significantly.

1