BeerPoweredNonsense
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_jay4bff wrote
Reply to comment by PEVEI in Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem by ye_olde_astronaut
>active satellites
The main issues with "too much shit in orbit" are, I believe: 1. Risk of Kessler Syndrome 2. Impact on astronomy.
In both the above, a dead satellite is as much of a risk as an active satellite. More so in fact - an active satellite can be ordered to dodge an imminent collision.
The US are tracking IIRC 13,000 objects in orbit. To focus only on active satellites is unscientific.
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_jad8te6 wrote
Reply to comment by sanjsrik in The European Hyperloop overtakes Elon Musk’s: 500 km of tunnels under Swiss soil by CelebrationDirect209
>This appears to be a post about Elon Musk or one of his companies. Please keep discussion focused on the actual topic / technology and not praising / condemning Elon. Off topic flamewars will be removed and participants may be banned.
On my screen I'm seeing this AutoModerator message just above your little rant.
Lol.
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_j963k4v wrote
Reply to comment by Razakel in An Open Secret (2014) - A film exposing pedophilia and the sexual abuse of children in the entertainment industry in Hollywood. [1:38:22] by unknown_human
You're right, I forgot about that part of the story!
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_j92n9hd wrote
Reply to comment by Razakel in An Open Secret (2014) - A film exposing pedophilia and the sexual abuse of children in the entertainment industry in Hollywood. [1:38:22] by unknown_human
It's a bit more involved than that. You can't label people guilty by association, it's a fundamental principle of free countries.
However, in this particular case this admin - Aimee Channelor - used to be a minor politician in the UK, was a candidate in an election, and hired their father as campaign manager even while he was waiting to be tried for raping a 10 year old. So at the very least this Aimee Channelor made a massive error of judgement when hiring their campaign manager. For this they were booted out of the political party.
They they joined a different UK party - but got kicked out again when it came to light that their partner was publishing paedophile erotica.
Then Reddit decided that this Aimee was just the right person to be an admin.
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_j0q3age wrote
Reply to comment by Hershieboy in SpaceX, Blue Origin Executives Tapped as US Space Council Advisers by Soupjoe5
He "claims" his dad had a mine.
That's the thing about this story - it's just a couple of "claims" in interviews, from either Elon Musk - a man who is, ahem, known for making outlandish claims. Or else an interview with his dad, a man who's busy fucking his own step-daughter and getting her pregnant. Unless someone can actually show me the name and location of the mine - which shouldn't be that difficult, mines are not exactly easy to hide - I'll remain dubious.
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_j0pim97 wrote
Reply to comment by Hershieboy in SpaceX, Blue Origin Executives Tapped as US Space Council Advisers by Soupjoe5
>an apartheid Era emerald mine
The emerald mine is a Reddit favorite, but if you dig into it there's very little to prove it ever existed e.g. Snopes could not find anything.
BeerPoweredNonsense t1_jazqav9 wrote
Reply to comment by simcoder in Half of all active satellites are now from SpaceX. Here’s why that may be a problem by ye_olde_astronaut
No one's dismissing it - in particular, the US authorities forced several adaptations to Starlink in order to reduce the risks of mega-constellations e.g. insisting that satellites fully burn-up on re-entry in order to minimise risks to the v1.0 humans on the ground.
It is normal to be wary, and to insist on proceeding with caution. However many of the anti-Starlink posters are just hiding their hate-boner for Elon under a pseudo-scientific veneer. E.g. mention Starlink on Reddit and you're guaranteed "Kessler Syndrome!" and "Astronomy!" replies. But posts about the other mega-constellations currently in deployment do not seem to attract the same "science-based concern" :shrugs: