BenjaminHamnett

BenjaminHamnett t1_j87xiz6 wrote

Money is just distributed voting for what we prioritize (prices) so resources can be distributed efficiently. Society can choose to endow people more or less money, there will always be things society wants and will give the people that provide it extra “votes” to spend

5

BenjaminHamnett t1_j7ujbm2 wrote

The main thing is that it writes code

Given enough hardware resources and capacity, with evolutionary programming, this is as clear of a threshold to the singularity as we are going to get. Will it happen this year? I don’t know. But if it is writing code, if the singularity Ai can be written in any code similar to todays languages then it is just a matter of time before an infinite number of digital monkeys write the proverbial Shakespearean play or whatever that string of code summons our silicon overlord

2

BenjaminHamnett t1_j7uhjmm wrote

I always assumed some one or cyborg society would merge with the AI. It may come down to arbitrary semantics to describe what happens.

I always assumed a combined cyborg hive would always be stronger than AI alone. The last human creators would have more incentive and more capability than (relatively) detached programmers, if there could even be such a thing, considering anyone reading this today is already essentially a cyborg.

That AI is writing code already is what skews the odds a bit now. it becomes a bit more likely someone will give a detached AI enough computing power to use evolutionary programming to bootstrap a sci-fi singularity. I still think this is less likely than a neural implant cyborg hive mind singularity, but the odds are approaching 50:50, where before I thought it was more like 90:10 to be cyborg based instead of straight hardware.

5

BenjaminHamnett t1_iyr3i68 wrote

Great answer, but I feel like I’ve seen a few real-time examples of core devotees seeing this coming from a distance and using this as the inverse of “lack of proof IS proof” trope. They are hyper aware of anything that’s taking attention away from their cult and say “see, they know were onto them, so they’re trying to distract us with staged events that take the wind out of our sails and make us look silly”

0

BenjaminHamnett t1_iwbrfqc wrote

This just means people who didn’t master the craft get a say in story telling (programming) also. It’s actually more Democratic. This reminds me of pearl clutching marginal professional writers being displaced by the horde of amateur writers who don’t make money but get to tell their stories now through self publishing.

What if tshirt designs could only be made by people who learned silkscreening or pictures could only be taken by people who studied cinematography and film developing etc

People are mad they learned a craft to give themselves a platform but now everyone gets a platform

8

BenjaminHamnett t1_it7mkdk wrote

I dunno. I may not have liked it when it happened but I was usually better off getting these reminders. Even I fake it sometimes and it works.

The crazy thing about the habit of remembering to look for silver linings and reasons to be grateful, is that even when you can’t find them, the act of looking actually cheers people up. That’s a powerful realization

1

BenjaminHamnett t1_iquzfjn wrote

1