Bierculles
Bierculles t1_iss5ofu wrote
Reply to comment by Desperate_Donut8582 in Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp
honestly, i would absolutely watch a robot dunking on randos in the street.
Bierculles t1_iss5lby wrote
Reply to comment by therealzombieczar in Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp
Robotics will be a really interresting one, Robotics are a hell of a lot harder than most people believe. We still have a very long way to go before the first generall purpose robot can even atempt to replace humans. Building specific optimized robots is currently way more efficient and doable.
Bierculles t1_iss5frk wrote
Reply to comment by supermegaampharos in Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp
The artists could be the people who use the AI, making an AI do what you actually want is a lot harder than it looks, especially if you need something specific.
Bierculles t1_iss491o wrote
Reply to comment by FranciscoJ1618 in Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp
I am an engineer, i am currently wondering when i will be replaced. Though training data for engineering is going to be an issue, the companies sure as hell are not going to just hand over all of their data so what would you even train the AI on? With coding that is not a problem because of sites like github.
Bierculles t1_isrtt3u wrote
Reply to Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp
We should start a new field of study that i think we will really need in a few years. Communicating with AI, a fancy shmanzy AI is nice and all, but making it do the thing you actually want could become a pretty huge hurdle, especially when you want very specific and complicated things.
And who is better at this than the people who allready work in that field. Trying to make good art with stable diffusion made me realize pretty quickly that creating actually good images is a lot harder than one might think. Having knowledge about art, styles and how it actually works helps a lot. A layman doesn't even now what the right question is.
So now for a lot of artists and whatever fields get hit next it could quickly become a situation of who adapts the fastest to the new tech and uses it effectively. Though this only applies to narrow AI, AGI is going to throw everything out the window but that is an entirely different beast we will need to tackle.
Bierculles t1_isoyygk wrote
Reply to comment by byttle in Vaccines to treat cancer possible by 2030, say BioNTech founders by Shelfrock77
A great way to sort out the dumb though. It is not contagious so the only people they are hurting is themselfes.
Bierculles t1_is5ouqq wrote
Reply to comment by notirrelevantyet in AIs are now expert-human-level in no-press Diplomacy and Hanabi by Ezekiel_W
imagine a standoff between two superoptimized AI's playing Risk or something like that and they employ some ultra gigabrain strats and nobody has any clue what they AI is even planning.
Bierculles t1_irvdl1t wrote
Reply to Am I crazy? Or am I right? by AdditionalPizza
It's called the dead internet theory, look it up. While i think we are not quite there yet, i do think that this is allready a problem that will get much much worse in the next few years.
Bierculles t1_iruzr4i wrote
Reply to comment by Apart_Shock in Quantum windows mean machines can see millions of colours by Apart_Shock
A-Eye... oof
Bierculles t1_iruzg0x wrote
Pionger
Bierculles t1_irdmpas wrote
Reply to META QUEST PRO mixed reality passthrough by Shelfrock77
IF a metaverse or AR ever takes of it sure as hell is not going to be with whatever the fuck meta is currently doing. This looks like shit.
Bierculles t1_irdlh40 wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in “Extrapolation of this model into the future leads to short AI timelines: ~75% chance of AGI by 2032” by Dr_Singularity
hard to say, the thing is, one slipup from the top is enough for AGI to spread exponentially. Also i recon that countries that have it availabe for the public are going to rapidly outpace those who don't in pretty much every way possible.
Bierculles t1_irdlaue wrote
Reply to comment by Mino8907 in “Extrapolation of this model into the future leads to short AI timelines: ~75% chance of AGI by 2032” by Dr_Singularity
we probably solved less than 0.1% of the scientific problems that are out there so i doubt it. I don't think that there is even an end to scientific problems.
Bierculles t1_irdl8c6 wrote
Reply to comment by Yuli-Ban in “Extrapolation of this model into the future leads to short AI timelines: ~75% chance of AGI by 2032” by Dr_Singularity
I really want the oracle AI
Bierculles t1_iss8br4 wrote
Reply to comment by GhostInTheNight03 in A new AI model can accurately predict human response to novel drug compounds by Dr_Singularity
Did the other guy edit his comment or did you accidently reply to the wrong guy? Your comment makes no sense at all.