CaptainObvious110

CaptainObvious110 t1_iydu4yo wrote

Say that to the people who refuse to drive their motor vehicles in a responsible way. Why is that so hard to do?

Why can't they get off of their phones and pay attention to what they are doing and if they lack the ability to do that then they don't need to be in command of a vehicle that weighs thousands of pounds.

0

CaptainObvious110 t1_iydtr76 wrote

How far would they have to go to do their cookouts if cars were banned?

As far as bikes being $5,000 that doesn't represent the normal folks that are on their bikes every day. Both of my bicycles combined were about $1,000. Paid in full at the time of purchase

I use my bike for recreation, yes and that's not a sin. But to be honest, I do food delivery on it, get my groceries with it bring laundry to the laundry mat. Virtually every thing I need to do or want to do is on a bicycle.

Need to carry extra passengers there are bikes for that kids? There are bikes for that.

0

CaptainObvious110 t1_iydspnb wrote

Yes it is and that's a reason I am glad to not just have one bike but two of them. I went to the bike shop saw one for what I felt was a decent price when they were scarce and got it. It's mine no insurance, no car note just paid the $500 or so dollars and I instantly have a means of transportation.

This proved to be a game changer because I no longer had to ride the bus and deal with people's shenanigans there. Nor did I have to wait for a bus again I could just take my bike out and do what I needed to do.

During Covid that proved to be even more important as I could avoid people a lot and go out to the National Arboretum and be somewhere I could just relax.

A few months later I got a folding bicycle to make traveling with a bicycle even more convenient.

Again. No car note paid less than $1,000 for both bikes which is a lot less than people are going to even spend on a car in the first place. Don't have to worry about gas either.

You can get an electric bike for $1,000 or even a cargo bike for more but no matter what of those options you take you would save money on a car.

Shoot buy a bike for each family member and you still save a truck load of money

1

CaptainObvious110 t1_iy6nrcz wrote

I've ridden them before and the app gives you guidance regarding a safe place to put them. If they were up against the wall and out of the way then fine I can understand that and there are indeed plenty of walls in this city for sure.

The original post was about scooters. While I agree that people driving their cars recklessly is indeed a major problem that should have been addressed years ago, it doesn't then mean that the scooter issue is something to just let go either.

At the end of the day if you follow the money trail it will lead you to politicians who are getting their palms greased.

1

CaptainObvious110 t1_iy5byh8 wrote

I bike a lot for a living each day and have seen the trail on light st next to the Maryland Science Center blocked with scooters.

They also are frequently parked in the sidewalk where they don't belong as well.

Bottom line is they don't belong parked on a trail a side walk or anywhere except what's already been designated as a parking spot plain and simple.

Cars are indeed a real issue as well I certainly agree with you on that one for sure

Basically we have people with vehicles that are completely inconsiderate of others and they NEED to be dealt with appropriately so this issue is rectified.

2

CaptainObvious110 t1_iy5awf4 wrote

The parishioner evidently had deep pockets then. Otherwise how do you explain having five houses? This then raises the question of what condition the houses were when they were acquired by the church?

If they were livable at the time, then why wasn't that pursued at a time when it would have been much easier to keep them afloat rather than they sit for decades and fall apart?

30 years is a really really long time to sit on properties and to be very frank, that shouldn't be allowed in the first place.

I'm assuming that Mt Vernon wasn't a slum 30 years ago so I have a hard time making sense of such valuable real estate just sitting there without any real buyers.

1

CaptainObvious110 t1_iy22q3p wrote

Which raises the question of why they would accept or hold onto properties if they do not have the means of repairing them?

If anything selling those properties would make available more funds that could be used to maintain their building and to assist others as they have been doing.

Please forgive me if I have said anything wrong.

2