You assumed the candidate was aggressive. You’ve created a whole narrative of how this went down based on zero evidence. Which just bolsters my initial point that facts are the least important of your position.

Candidates for office are required to approach people to get signatures. It’s either approach them in public places like sidewalks or parks or go door to door. If you have an issue with them obtain personal information your issue is with the law not the candidate

If a candidate or their campaigners are being aggressive and harassing people that is not covered by the 1st amendment.

Excellent job addressing the underlying issue.

Who cares who funded them when they are defending a sound principle? Your post is a perfect example ‘people I don’t like are in favor of it therefore I’m against it’.

Edgy way to be anti-religious.

Funding PSP out of the motor license fund was a legislative decision

But those are projections and not actual numbers. The only actual number quoted was 195

I don’t think Planes, Trains and Automobiles is obscure

You’ll have to take it up with Pennlive headline writer.

Seniority is the foundation of unions. It plays some factor in nearly every workplace decision. Pay, promotion, leave, job bid etc have seniority as one of the factors

The three largest cities in PA are Philly, Pittsburgh and Allentown. None of those rivers run through Allentown.

The Mariah Carey Christmas song is ear cancer

The relevant statute for those who are interested.

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/18/00.055.010.000..HTM

Congress shouldn’t be in the labor negotiation business. If Congress believes an industry is so vital to the nation that its workers cannot strike they need to enact a law similar to PA’s Act 111. That law says cops and firefighters can’t strike and that labor impasses are settled in binding arbitration.

Why should they certify something that they are unsure of? The word certify has meaning and generally means that it has been verified to meet some standard. I would think withholding certification until the DA completes the investigation would be more appropriate

The guy that abstained from the first vote will vote to certify the election so this lawsuit will be moot. The whole voter fraud charade is really stupid.

Different point:

> boards must certify the result of election returns regardless of any error or fraud that is discovered during the count or certification process

This seems wrong. There was no widespread in this election so this is a hypothetical point. Let’s say there was solid evidence of widespread fraud. What’s the remedy? How do you certify an election you know to be fraudulent?

The guns are usually locked in a gun rack and to unlock them you need to press a button usually on the light bar control head. It should be an unlabeled button and sometimes it has a dummy label on it like Aux1 or something like that.

If I was state official I’d have an ordinary license plate. The last thing I’d do is have a plate that say ‘hey look at me. I’m special’

Mine was blue with the rainbow.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATM_card

MAC = Money Access Center. They were really the only way to get money in the 80s - early 90s. If I remember correctly the MAc card didn’t have your bank’s name on it. It was just blue card that said MAC.

No, you wouldn’t be fine. The employer is required to pay OT for anything beyond 40 hrs in a week. If they require you to work 10 hours in a single day you aren’t required to pay OT so long as you aren’t exceeding 40 hours.

Correct. I don’t have a cat and no nothing about the sides of the debate nor do I care to know. Thus my agnostic position

People are capable of doing multiple things. You don’t have to solve ever large scale problem prior to solving small problems.

That said I’m agnostic on cat declawing.

Campaign ads keep local TV profitable

The democrat governor could have vetoed it and the democrats who voted for it could have voted no but they didn’t.