Cognitive_Spoon

Cognitive_Spoon t1_j1vvik1 wrote

Reply to comment by Nixeris in AI and education by lenhoi

That's goofy.

Logic is a process. Math is a process. Historical contextualization and extrapolation is a process.

Education is riddled with processes, because thinking is riddled with processes.

Students don't merely exist in school, they pursue.

6

Cognitive_Spoon t1_j1vvco9 wrote

Reply to comment by Sadalfas in AI and education by lenhoi

I disagree with you being downvoted.

I'm on three separate degrees in pedagogy, and I think you make a fair construction of how it might be navigated. One of many ways, to be sure, but not an invalid one.

2

Cognitive_Spoon t1_j18tu84 wrote

History says you're half right.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2022/01/19/understanding-the-impact-of-automation-on-workers-jobs-and-wages/

The problem with this specific kind of automation, is it will surpass human cognitive load ability for writing, design, and discourse.

If you replace human novel problem solving with machines, we don't really have much to provide beyond the ability to make more humans who can do better fiddly manual labor than machines.

1

Cognitive_Spoon t1_j18te17 wrote

Same thought.

Unfortunately, education discourse gets pulled into the same stupid false binary of debate team logic as most other discourse driven by social media.

Both/and is an absolute rarity in edu Twitter. Everyone wants to sell something, build their brand, especially if it involves dunking on someone else for failing to meet their personal ethics. It's bad.

We need to do both, until the first is no longer possible.

2

Cognitive_Spoon t1_j15xamu wrote

I have three degrees in education, Ed leadership, Ed systems and Ed k-12 teaching. And I'm entering administrative work.

I don't have to imagine.

Right now the entirety of our conversations are around how to respond to ChatGPT and other AI disruptions.

The two camps boil down to:

  1. We need to prepare students to use AI to improve their workflow for a diminishing number of potential human jobs.

  2. We need to help students advocate for a post-labor mankind that values people regardless of their ability to produce capital.

It's pretty wild.

17

Cognitive_Spoon t1_j0yo0xa wrote

Same thought.

The way that almost all UAP sightings describe craft that "defy physical limitations or understanding of aerodynamics" is kind of a hint.

The UAP isn't the whole thing, it's the but that extrudes into perceivable dimensions. Like the top of a shark fin breaking the water.

The fin isn't the fish, it's the bit we see because we don't live under water.

Interdimensional also allows for breaking "the rules" of speed and time in 4 dimensional space, because they can dip in the way you'd dip your pinky into a fish tank.

To a fish, when you put your hand in a fish tank, a strange five legged creature has just descended from heaven.

You pull your hand out of the tank. Poof! The five legged creature disappeared!

You put your hand back in the tank behind the fish. Poof! It's back!

2

Cognitive_Spoon t1_iy6b8nh wrote

It's a scam. Those eight eddies are nothing compared to the botnets being propped up by eight million eddies.

You can use an AI to make 5 pics of someone who doesn't exist in thirty seconds. Take those five pics, slap them on a bot account, and viola, you got a bit that "looks" like someone who can't be reverse image searched. Someone unique.

Social Media is about to get massively less easy to parse.

It's always been a game played by corpos, it's just going to get harder to play if you don't got the buy in money.

14