Cryptizard

Cryptizard t1_j2hzmlw wrote

That’s not really how Grover’s algorithm works. It can find the correct preimage of a function with only O(sqrt(N)) calls to the function. It can’t find things in a list in less than O(N) time because it would take that long just to read the list elements into registers.

3

Cryptizard t1_j28xo7a wrote

This sub is not a representative sample. Many people come her specifically to delude themselves to make them feel better about their lives. Think about people you actually know, in real life. Most people I know don’t even play video games, they are too busy living their lives. VR would make no difference to them.

6

Cryptizard t1_j28u5vd wrote

If you think this is a danger it says more about you than it does the technology. Most people do not want to just sink into a comfortable, warm bliss for their lives.

Why do people do extreme sports, hiking, spelunking, diving, etc.? They pay money to be uncomfortable. To push themselves. It is part of human nature. VR is not going to eliminate that.

2

Cryptizard t1_j251li2 wrote

Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomburg and Warren Buffet have pledged to (and already started) give all their money away. Bill Gates has almost single-handedly eradicated polio around the world.

Anyway, none of these people are holding onto cash. They have investments in other companies, which if they just liquidated would, again, cause a lot of damage to those companies, their employees and the other investors. Those companies are doing something helpful to society or else they wouldn't be making money.

1

Cryptizard t1_j24m0x0 wrote

I think you are confused about what it means to be an ultra-rich billionaire. They are not sitting on billions of dollars of cash and just choosing not to use it to help people. They are “worth” billions of dollars because they own companies that are worth that much. The companies are doing things that are valuable to society, which is why they are worth that money in the first place.

Yes, Elon Musk could try to liquidate Tesla and use that money to feed the poor or whatever, but then nobody is making electric cars, thousands of employees are fired and lose their income/health insurance, research on battery tech stops, etc. It’s not clear this is even a net benefit.

4

Cryptizard t1_j1ztgm5 wrote

38

Cryptizard t1_j1wlxvc wrote

1

Cryptizard t1_j1w2xwl wrote

The best way to save the planet is for all of us to live in self-sustaining communes in rural areas. You going to volunteer to do that? Or are you just trying to force your lifestyle on others because it costs you nothing?

0

Cryptizard t1_j1vyzpu wrote

But you can’t make people move, I don’t understand what you are suggesting at this point. A lot of people don’t want to live in the city center. Or they do but their work is outside of the city. It is just how it is, no addition of public transit or regulations is going to make people do what you want.

1

Cryptizard t1_j1vx20n wrote

1

Cryptizard t1_j1vt2dv wrote

1