Cryptizard
Cryptizard t1_j8t1dq7 wrote
Reply to comment by prolaspe_king in The Turing test flaw by sailhard22
>People don't assuming they're talking to AI, they always assume they're talking to a human.
Well, that's not the Turing test then.
Cryptizard t1_j8rxlsr wrote
Reply to comment by redditgollum in LLMs are not being used for what they are best at by Scarlet_pot2
But won't it still be pretty impossible for regular people to run? It is not like Stable Diffusion where you can do it on a GPU. The GPT models require hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of hardware.
Cryptizard t1_j8d86dt wrote
Reply to comment by NTIASAAHMLGTTUD in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
The humans they tested on were random people on Mechanical Turk, so that data point is not very illuminating.
Cryptizard t1_j8d7xv0 wrote
Reply to This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Keep in mind that the “human” line here is data they got from assigning the questions to randos on Mechanical Turk. It is not saying that their model is better than scientists. Still a really cool result, I just know how people here love to jump to insane conclusions.
Cryptizard t1_j8bhc6b wrote
Reply to comment by tinyhorsesinmytea in Cultivating a sense of perspective about pet loss can lead to post-traumatic growth after their death by chrisdh79
Every few years? What is she doing to her pets?
Cryptizard t1_j7pc4vi wrote
Reply to comment by p3opl3 in AI Progress of February Week 1 (1-7 Feb) by Pro_RazE
DALLE was released in 2021 and GPT-3 in 2020. If posts around here are anything to go by they were kind of a big deal.
Cryptizard t1_j7p26uc wrote
Reply to comment by zendonium in AI Progress of February Week 1 (1-7 Feb) by Pro_RazE
If that was true then we could just train a model on all the AI research we have and get a “narrow AGI” that makes AI models. Singularity next week. Unfortunately, that is not how it is.
Cryptizard t1_j7p13yv wrote
Reply to comment by Savings-Juice-9517 in AI Progress of February Week 1 (1-7 Feb) by Pro_RazE
You could have said that any year before now, and will be able to say it every year in the future. That is kind of the point of exponential growth.
Cryptizard t1_j7i30ce wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainObvious110 in The new Lexington Market is so disappointing by sleaziep
I'm sorry but your comment is completely uncalled for. I responded twice to OP in a civil manner and they insulted me both times and lied about their own experience in order to exaggerate their point for some reason. I don't have to just take that. OP has like 100 downvotes while I have upvotes, it seems like my comment was completely called for.
Cryptizard t1_j7aiyl6 wrote
Reply to comment by sleaziep in The new Lexington Market is so disappointing by sleaziep
You have been caught lying and insulting me twice now. Why should I believe or care about anything you say? You are seriously a piece of shit.
Cryptizard t1_j797hry wrote
Reply to comment by TheCaptainDamnIt in The new Lexington Market is so disappointing by sleaziep
There is an actual deli, Royal Deli, even. Also Blue Island Malaysian is there, and they have been at the market for decades. It is probably what OP was thinking of when they said "chinese." they don't seem very observant.
Cryptizard t1_j795mps wrote
Reply to comment by sleaziep in The new Lexington Market is so disappointing by sleaziep
>no fresh veggies / fish, meat and poultry
Bro can you read? There are literally two fresh seafood merchants (Faidley's, Cho's Sea Garden), two butchers (Buffalo Bill's II, Brookdale Farms Poultry) and a place called Garden Produce that sells fruit and vegetables. I feel like I am going crazy, or else you are a troll.
Cryptizard t1_j78b4bu wrote
Reply to The new Lexington Market is so disappointing by sleaziep
You can see from the website that literally all of the things you listed are coming, they just aren't all ready yet.
Cryptizard t1_j73fste wrote
Reply to First Latina to be crowned Miss Coppin State University faces backlash by PleaseBmoreCharming
I'm stuck on why do they even have a Miss Coppin State University? Isn't this supposed to be a school, like where people go to learn important things? It sounds like a joke.
Cryptizard t1_j6jx7w6 wrote
This is really cool, but it is also a great demo of how bad AI is at humor. Every joke is completely terrible :D
Cryptizard t1_j6jpf2c wrote
Reply to comment by SgathTriallair in If we achieve AGI in the next ten years, and if we achieve the singularity in the next ten years, will there be an option to entering a hive mind with people who we only know? Also when we achieve AGI and singularity, will there be options to control or modify our mental health(anxiety, depression? by pipe2057
Are you sure you can't tell me whether my neural interface that lets me control reality will come in multiple colors or not? Seems like a really simple question that somebody should be able to answer.
Cryptizard t1_j6jg1rm wrote
Reply to comment by natepriv22 in What jobs will be one of the last remaining ones? by MrCensoredFace
We have no way to know what is going to happen, even in the near future. Any job could be replace. Better to study something you are interested in, at least it will be personally fulfilling to you.
Cryptizard t1_j6f0ga8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What would quantum computing mean for AGI? by multiverseportalgun
That’s not really how quantum computers work. They are only faster on some specific problems, not many of which are actually useful. One of those is simulating quantum systems, but you need more qubits than you have particles in the simulation so the computer would have to be bigger than the thing you are simulating.
Cryptizard t1_j68z6z9 wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
I don’t think you know how a STM works.
Cryptizard t1_j68yewh wrote
Reply to comment by grangonhaxenglow in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
You know that is not what they are talking about.
Cryptizard t1_j68ycty wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
You need something the size of an atom that is more rigid/more manipulatable than atoms. Too bad everything is made of atoms so there is no such thing.
Cryptizard t1_j68xihc wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
You know that not every technology you can think of it actually possible according to the physical laws of the universe, right? There is no way to manually "arrange atoms."
Cryptizard t1_j66fqna wrote
Reply to Don't despair; there is decent likelihood that an extremely large amount of resources will flow from AGI to the common man (even without UBI) by TheKing01
>So if OpenAI creates AGI, the average person gets 0.0000000125% of a zillion dollars
Why do you think that a company being non-profit means that they have to give all their profits equally to everyone around the country? It just means they can't make a profit, they can spend the money on whatever they want.
Cryptizard t1_j5yw9wk wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in homeownership rate will be over 80% in the future because everyone will be able to own at least a small condo in low cost of living places due to remote work and indoor living. by Pitiful-Internal-196
And they are downvoting you for pointing out the truth lol it’s fucking depressing… It’s easier to tell yourself that nothing is your fault and the system makes it impossible for you rather than face more uncomfortable possibilities.
Cryptizard t1_j8t7nw5 wrote
Reply to What if Bing GPT, Eleven Labs and some other speech to text combined powers... by TwitchTvOmo1
I think you would be surprised how bad that would turn out. Imagine if someone talked to you the way that GPT writes its responses. It looks okay in written form, but it is not at all how people talk. It would be serious uncanny valley.