DickieGreenleaf84

DickieGreenleaf84 t1_j09fx3w wrote

You'd probably enjoy the tv thriller, Devs. Yeah, it is interesting as a pop-pseudo-philosophical discussion, but it isn't very realistic. Even what you say about weather prediction involves quite a lot of hyperbole. Weather prediction is still not very accurate.

The show really interested me because it's premise was that it would be even easier still to look back and replicate the past by using the data we have today. To extrapolate what we don't know by comparing what we do with the path things took from that point to now.

35

DickieGreenleaf84 t1_iycps2s wrote

> For HP one thing i noticed is that every movie had a arc or conclusion satisfactory for that particular movie while building the greater thread

It did for the first four. The last ones would be pretty shit without the rest of the movies backing them.

But yeah, it's not like, say, the Mission Impossible franchise, where any one film stands alone.

1

DickieGreenleaf84 t1_iyconm0 wrote

Yeah, it's why I disagree that the movies are "the greatest", by themselves. By themselves, the Potter movies still work. The LOTR movies, IMO, don't work without being a fan of the books first.

That said, is there another fantasy franchise? That plays a major factor, too. You can compare way more action franchises, or crime franchises, than fantasy. So maybe in the future when the genre gets more respect, we will see more challengers.

−1