Dykam
Dykam t1_j8wm1ju wrote
Reply to comment by Dykam in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
There's some sense to having the second trend (2018-2021) visible, but it should be on a different graph, the two data pieces are not really compatible.
Dykam t1_j8wlxvx wrote
Reply to comment by viridiformica in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
Nonlogaritmic https://i.imgur.com/z6RZpvC.png
Dykam t1_j8wpt3m wrote
Reply to comment by Utoko in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
Because the image actually makes a separate point of saying "99.59 % in 5 years", which isn't all that interesting as it's almost the same %, 98.92% in just the first year. In a way, it's presenting the data in a way making it less impressive than it is.
This is /r/dataisbeautiful, not r/whateverlooksnice, so critiquing data presentation seems appropriate.