Eagle_Arm

Eagle_Arm t1_j210owq wrote

But I live here now....why don't you accept me as if I was your old neighbor!?

I don't think people realize it's years or decades of trust being built between people that allowed that to occur.

Someone hunted this year on some land I have. They asked permission even though I have known them since I was a kid. The common courtesy thing to do. When year was over, they gave me a gift card for groceries.

Nothing crazy expensive and wouldn't be enough to fill a basket of groceries, but it wasn't expected or implied. More of a, "you fucker, you didn't have to do that." They also did the gift card trick because if it was money, it's easier to deny money even though it's exactly the same.

People expect all the benefits of a lifelong neighbor on move-in without building the relationship.

12

Eagle_Arm t1_j1uqu52 wrote

Reply to comment by YOurAreWr0ng in Winter Crocks by ExpressionFamiliar98

What's that? Not wear a comfortable piece of footwear that has multiple uses and you can easily slide in and off?

It's fine if not confident enough to wear clothes without the fear of judgement from others.

Worrying about what other people think of your shoes and clothes generally goes away when grow up.

That's the main reason they exist. The wearers don't give a fuck about what they look like.

0

Eagle_Arm t1_j0vvay1 wrote

Reply to comment by Khanover7 in "Dogspam" by pv_punisher

Using the word psychotic would be pretty spot on if saying they aren't in touch with reality, which is what they are doing. It fits that definition pretty well. Or likely, the most likely in fact, it is hyperbole, which a normal person would read it as.

Could go deeper if wanted and call it an attachment disorder. Which would bring it back to a mental disorder, not psychotic, but a form of a mental illness.

3

Eagle_Arm t1_j0vntu8 wrote

Reply to comment by Khanover7 in "Dogspam" by pv_punisher

Dude, way to edit your comment, change what it actually said, and not mark how it was changed.

Was there some reflecting on how shitty the comment was after I copy/pasted it in a reply to it?

3

Eagle_Arm t1_j0vl25z wrote

Reply to comment by Khanover7 in "Dogspam" by pv_punisher

You just highlighted the complete lack of anything in your life if this is what you have time to reply to. I pity your sorry life that you want to police how people interact or talk about their complaints. Carry on sad little person.

−3

Eagle_Arm t1_j0vjql2 wrote

Reply to "Dogspam" by pv_punisher

As someone adding to the dog spam, growing up with dogs, but not currently owning one, I completely agree with you. They are dogs, just a pet, nothing more. If someone wants a kid or baby, either make one, foster, or adopt one. There are plenty of kids out there looking for a home and adopting would be better for society as a whole than another doggo.

But really, of the owner isn't a dick and doesn't impact others, feel free to have dogs too.

−7

Eagle_Arm t1_j0s9uve wrote

So you work 'with' stock brokers? But you're not a stock broker, so easier to say you know other people successful with money, but you aren't yourself?

So they took the money they had and knew how to reallocate their investments into more money? Not something the average person is doing now is it? So you're saying they did their job....to make more money? Fascinating!

Continue to make generalized statements about doing solar and having it solve all your problems or getting a cell phone for $20 a month......ya ok....it's me out of touch. Who knew forecasting about actual realities and how life is still expensive after retiring is a crazy idea? Maybe people shouldn't save money for the years when they can't really work! Have you heard about the grasshopper and the ant?

−1

Eagle_Arm t1_izx7ls9 wrote

Not even close to the same level of development then compared to now.

Let's just look at Vermont. What cities does the interstate run through or are they outside cities?

So want to smack a train station in Burlington...point anywhere on a map where a station could be build and then where any lines could run.

−1

Eagle_Arm t1_izwqreh wrote

In the hypothetical, they said it was reality.

Government is there to not make a profit, but to break even or take a slight loss. I don't see how the train system is anything but a major loss or how it's even possible with private property. How much imminent domain will have to be claimed for this to occur?

−2

Eagle_Arm t1_izua5ti wrote

You're shitting on them for speaking reality to your comment, when you said your comment was reality and not fantasy?

So they spoke reality to what you said was reality. They didn't respond with fantasy to what was a supposed reality comment. I'm not sure where the disconnect is.

−1

Eagle_Arm t1_izauysr wrote

Oh, don't get me wrong, if betting came to VT, I'd probably throw some money into it every now and then. I also buy a powerball ticket with it's a billion dollars, but with a bet, I also don't expect to see that money. It's just petty cash that if win/lose, it doesn't matter.

The issue I see with betting is the people who will keep it in business, the same asottery tickets. The, "I just haven't caught the break yet" folks.

I'd like to see sports betting in VT, but I also see it as something that isn't "good".

1