Evidently_21
Evidently_21 OP t1_itvj6vd wrote
Full blog explaining analysis here: https://evidently.substack.com/p/programmable-alarm-clocks
Analysis using data on matches from World Championship Matches, Candidates events and Interzonals here: https://www.pgnmentor.com/files.html#events
Analysis using bigchess package in R and Stockfish UCI and graphics using ggplot in R.
Evidently_21 OP t1_irqiwmk wrote
Reply to [OC] Percent of human moves matching computer recommended moves in top chess tournaments by Evidently_21
Thanks for the gold kind stranger! If anyone is interested in reading full article or other data-based blogs on sports and chess you can find the article here:
https://evidently.substack.com/p/the-reverse-turing-test
and follow me on substack here: https://evidently.substack.com/
Evidently_21 OP t1_irqim7e wrote
Reply to comment by eric5014 in [OC] Percent of human moves matching computer recommended moves in top chess tournaments by Evidently_21
Yes it is this. The average evaluation change for opening is much smaller, there are just lots of pretty good options so matching exactly what computer recommends is hard.
Evidently_21 OP t1_irm59q1 wrote
Reply to comment by Future_Green_7222 in [OC] Percent of human moves matching computer recommended moves in top chess tournaments by Evidently_21
Agree, its interesting to see.
Evidently_21 OP t1_irm47v2 wrote
Reply to [OC] Percent of human moves matching computer recommended moves in top chess tournaments by Evidently_21
Full blog here: https://evidently.substack.com/p/the-reverse-turing-test
Source: PGNs from PGNMentor.com
Analysis using bigchess package in R and Stockfish, graph in ggplotly
Evidently_21 OP t1_itwss5j wrote
Reply to comment by statisticalanalysis_ in [OC] Where do humans and computers play on a chess board? by Evidently_21
Yes that inspired me