FacelessFellow
FacelessFellow t1_jdihuia wrote
Reply to [OC] Number of physicians per 1000 residents by giteam
So even if the U.S. had free healthcare, there aren’t enough doctors to treat us all anyway? Cool cool cool.
FacelessFellow t1_jd1httt wrote
Reply to A technical, non-moralist breakdown of why the rich will not, and cannot, kill off the poor via a robot army. by Eleganos
It just takes one rich guy right?
With the right connection they can develop a virus.
With the right amount of money they can buy a massive robot army.
Climate change would be the main reason to cull the global population. If you were infinitely wealthy and humans were infesting your only planet, you might be inclined to deal with the infestation.
FacelessFellow t1_jabh2j4 wrote
Reply to LPT: Feel like you still smell after taking a shower? Try occasionally using an antibacterial soap by [deleted]
Use clean towels when you want to be clean.
Use the same moldy towel all week if you do NOT want to be clean.
FacelessFellow t1_j79lhkg wrote
I’m never going to Arbys again.
The last time I ate there, I was reminded why I don’t eat there. I can’t believe I had to learn their multiple times.
I’d rather eat instant ramen.
FacelessFellow t1_j770iej wrote
Reply to comment by Fake_William_Shatner in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
So atomic mass is subjective? The table of elements is subjective?
Your comment just made it sound like a perspective thing. It’s sounds like it’s all about people and their subjective reality.
Objectively, an atom has so many electrons. Or does the number of electrons change depending on who is observing?
If I put 3 eggs on the table, it will be 3 eggs for someone else. Even if they’re blind, they can touch the eggs. Or be told by someone that it’s 3 eggs. I don’t see what can change the fact that there’s 3 eggs on the counter.
FacelessFellow t1_j75z2sr wrote
Reply to comment by Chase_the_tank in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
CharGPT is not true AI, though, is it? People keep saying we don’t have true AI yet.
FacelessFellow t1_j758am3 wrote
Reply to comment by Vince1128 in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
But what about AI made by AI made by AI. Would the human influence still be there?
It’s sounds like your saying computers and computer software will never evolve past what we have now. We don’t even understand gravity yet, maybe future computers/software will be unimaginable.
FacelessFellow t1_j757skq wrote
Reply to comment by Sad-Combination78 in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
But I thought AI was computers. And I thought computers could communicate at the speed of light. Wouldn’t that mean the AI could have input from billions of devices? Scientific instruments nowadays can connect to the web. Is it far fetched to imagine future where all collectible data from all devices could be perceived simultaneously by the AI?
FacelessFellow t1_j75215s wrote
Reply to comment by Sad-Combination78 in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
So if a human makes an AI the AI will have the humans biases. What about when the AI start making AI. Once that snowball starts rolling, won’t future generations of AI be far enough removed from human biases?
Will no AI ever be able to perceive all of reality instantaneously and objectively? When computational powers grow so immensely that they can track every atom in the universe, won’t that help AI see objective truth?
Perfection is a human construct, but flawlessness may be obtainable by future AI. With enough computational power it can check and double check and triple check and so on, to infinity. Will that not be enough to weed out all true reality?
FacelessFellow t1_j74vfea wrote
Reply to comment by Fake_William_Shatner in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
You don’t think there’s an objective truth/reality?
That’s a mind blowing concept for me.
FacelessFellow t1_j74utrs wrote
Reply to comment by demonicneon in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
I can’t wait for AI to be able to tell us (objectively) which humans are trash. I could be on that list.
It will help uneducated voters to never vote against their own interests again 👍🏽 the politicians of the future will literally not be able to lie, because the AI will tell us the truth.
FacelessFellow t1_j74nqc6 wrote
Reply to comment by Outrageous_Apricot42 in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
Is AI not gonna change or improve in the near future?
Is all AI going to be the same?
FacelessFellow t1_j74dpzg wrote
Reply to comment by Fake_William_Shatner in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
It’s like saying a math equation can be corrupted. It can be wrong(human error), but if it’s correct, it cannot be corrupted. 2+2=4 cannot be corrupted. Can it?
FacelessFellow t1_j74dgpw wrote
Reply to comment by Fake_William_Shatner in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
If there’s only ONE objective/factually reality, then we can program AI to perceive only ONE objective/factual reality.
The sun is hot. Agree? You think a good AI would be able to say, “no, the sun is cold.”?
The gasses we release into the atmosphere effect climate. Agree? You think a good AI would be able to say, “no, humans cannot effect climate.”?
Science aims to be as factual and accurate as possible. I imagine a true AI would know the scientific method and execute it perfectly.
Yes, some scientists are wrong, but the truth/facts usually prevail.
I don’t know if I’m making sense haha
FacelessFellow t1_j744i33 wrote
Reply to comment by Vince1128 in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
I’m sure that true AI will have a firm grasp of objective reality. Otherwise it’s not a very good AI.
truth is not subjective. If we can program ai to be nothing but truthful, then it cannot be corrupted. Right?
FacelessFellow t1_iy8yqdf wrote
Reply to How will the space economy alter society? by Gari_305
What resources would humans want access to if getting off planet earth was easier/cheaper?
How close are all the mineral filled asteroids?
FacelessFellow t1_ixiw4tv wrote
Reply to comment by SpokenByMumbles in Amazon to invest $1 billion yearly to produce movies for theaters by Familiar-Turtle
Peripheral is pretty cool. Really scratches my sci-fi itch.
FacelessFellow t1_ix4urh2 wrote
Reply to comment by southofsanity06 in Thieves stealing from Academy Sports in GA by ocean6csgo
🔥🔥🔥😱😱😱🔥🔥🔥
FacelessFellow t1_iwp410t wrote
Reply to comment by Jonathan-Shimshoni in 2022 World Cup Rosters and Player Club Locations [OC] by BoMcCready
More like heartless athletes.
FacelessFellow t1_iwnu50n wrote
This was from a year ago?
Needs more views. Needs a billion views!
FacelessFellow t1_iudfvur wrote
Reply to comment by snap-erection in E.U. plans for only electric new vehicles by 2035 ‘without precedent’ by do_you_even_ship_bro
Well people complaining about parking usually aren’t the poorest.
FacelessFellow t1_iu9sce8 wrote
Reply to comment by REOreddit in E.U. plans for only electric new vehicles by 2035 ‘without precedent’ by do_you_even_ship_bro
Is there enough street parking? For all the tenants?
FacelessFellow t1_iu9rhlj wrote
Reply to comment by REOreddit in E.U. plans for only electric new vehicles by 2035 ‘without precedent’ by do_you_even_ship_bro
But the tenants have cars??
FacelessFellow t1_isbah9b wrote
Reply to Would you be friends with a robot? by TheHamsterSandwich
Yes.
Most humans are robots. You know what I mean
FacelessFellow t1_jebdcp7 wrote
Reply to comment by dranaei in One day an AI will realize it too is insignificant in the grand scheme of things by Yourstruly75
So it can invest in stocks and rule the world legally