FoveatedRendering

FoveatedRendering t1_j7mlqeu wrote

If it's so enjoyable, all the more reason to automate it to get a lot more and increasingly better art.

Everyone enjoys art, 0.0001% can make it. AI will make the 99.9999% of people who enjoy art have more options and give superpowers to the previous 0.0001%(and any creator) to make more art.

1

FoveatedRendering t1_j6d0j0x wrote

I think almost all creatives will be using AI tools to bring their imaginations to life in the future.

Even when we have a perfect magic media machine, we won't know exactly what we want(unless the AI has our data), so we might often prefer to watch the most popular movies or play games that are made by other humans using this perfect magic media machine instead of doing it ourselves. I suspect media created by professionals using AI will always be better until AGI.

The popular media will eventually be edited to suit our tastes too. I see AI as another tool that humans will use to improve their productivity, it shouldn't be seen as humans vs AI but as Photoshop vs Dreambooth until AGI.

7

FoveatedRendering t1_j2xwrx9 wrote

Yes, I think AI and automation is a good thing that will lead us to the singularity, I just hope for an UBI so nobody is left behind once GPT-4 starts doing a lot of intellectual jobs.

You might be interested in this interview where an artist interviews an AI researcher.

2

FoveatedRendering t1_j2xqq4b wrote

Certainly from an artistic standpoint it's not possible to surpass Da Vinci, but a movie like Avatar 2 is more technologically advanced than any other from 10 years ago, or even a concept art for God of War uses higher technology. I expect AI to keep surpassing its own quality every year and reach quality levels that is impossible for humans to make in art, then movies, games, comics, books, music, programming, and eventually all other jobs.

Yes, I think ChatGPT-5 will be able to code an entire virtual canvas app with a single prompt where you can choose how much the AI helps with pictures.

About copyright, as an AGI enthusiast I want AIs to study the entire internet and then become our servants to accelerate AGI, but of course we need UBI first.

3

FoveatedRendering t1_j2xmgse wrote

I think AI art will be replaced by AI video, AI comics, AI games with a single prompt in ChatGPT-5 and be human assisted in ChatGPT-4. The current art technology is pretty but not superhuman and lacks consistency, once it surpasses the best humans it will likely become ubiquitous.

1

FoveatedRendering t1_j2nn2xf wrote

It will help for home robots to become mainstream, which is already happening(see Amazon Astro, Loona).

Google PaLM-SayCan proves it is feasible to have even humanoid AI robots right now when plugged to a large language model, they could just sell us the hardware and give software updates with a "Windows Robot 1" or similar. When they plug it to GPT-4 equivalents it will be good enough for a consumer release in 2023.

There are humanoid robot companion projects with realistic skin in China that have the robotics to walk but not the AI, some that most people would easily purchase as romantic partners if Google plugged their PaLM-SayCan AI right now, the problem is that a walkable humanoid robot like the CyberOne costs $89k to $104k.

My prediction: We could have walkable sex bots with GPT-4 this year for $50k from Microsoft or Google, but no company is willing to be a pioneer like Meta did for VR, so we will have it as soon as there are open source ChatGPT-4 and walking algorithms for the current sexbot companies to sell their products, or only open-source GPT-4 if it's capable of handling walking.

3