FusionRocketsPlease
FusionRocketsPlease t1_jcjobnl wrote
Reply to Those who know... by Destiny_Knight
Lmao Alpaca its related to the animal llama.
FusionRocketsPlease t1_jb66by8 wrote
Reply to comment by Zer0D0wn83 in What might slow this down? by Beautiful-Cancel6235
Analogy is your passion.
FusionRocketsPlease t1_ja3p9fb wrote
Reply to comment by AylaDoesntLikeYou in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
But wasn't everything moving to run on servers? I was told it was the future of consoles...
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j9jzgz3 wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
So is GPT-4 going to be released like this? Sneaky into other products?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j9jrj56 wrote
Reply to comment by maskedpaki in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
>GPT 4
Is it confirmed?
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j98ipwg wrote
Reply to comment by AllEndsAreAnds in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
What theory do you believe? Type physicalism? Token physicalism? I believe there is something in matter with mental properties. But only certain types of systems can realize human-like consciousness. I believe that a combination of mental properties of matter more token physicalism is the answer of consciousness A von Neumann computer cannot have consciousness by writing code that performs the "function" of consciousness. It cannot be conscious because there is something in the von Neumann configuration that does not allow it conscience.
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j98g9t2 wrote
Reply to comment by ipatimo in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
So do you believe Bing has qualia, intentionality, feelings?
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j98fsno wrote
Reply to comment by luisbrudna in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
I don't believe what I'm reading.
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j98f6yo wrote
Reply to comment by luisbrudna in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
And am I claiming this? I'm just saying that if something is intelligent but doesn't have qualia, then it shouldn't be treated as a being.
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j98ers6 wrote
Reply to comment by tt54l32v in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
Do you want to give rights to robots?
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j989609 wrote
Reply to comment by AllEndsAreAnds in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
Leftism attacks again.
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j97p2bc wrote
Reply to comment by AvgAIbot in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
You shouldn't take a solipsistic philosophical problem that seriously. We must assume that all humans are conscious because they have the same substrate (human brain).
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j97obg3 wrote
Reply to comment by CrelbowMannschaft in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
1 - People like you are willing to give "rights" (!!!) to tools simply based on their behavior. Others are terrified and think Bing has a conscience just because he uses first-person words that denote emotion.
2 - And if you think that a computer can be conscious just because of code, that means you believe in an ultra-liberal form of functionalism, which can only be confirmed or refuted by what I proposed in my post.
FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j97lzy4 wrote
Reply to comment by CrelbowMannschaft in How to definitely know if a system is conscious: by FusionRocketsPlease
You ignore exactly what I said in the post and tell us to do exactly what I proposed we shouldn't do.
Submitted by FusionRocketsPlease t3_116mmya in singularity
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j96us9s wrote
Reply to comment by Redditing-Dutchman in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
These people never get unenployed.
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j96um3f wrote
Reply to comment by bass6c in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
>OpenAI recent success comes at a heavy cost for the ai community. Companies such as Google, Meta and Amazon will most likely stop publishing influential papers.
What the hell they expected?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8f0e7l wrote
Reply to comment by arisalexis in Altman vs. Yudkowsky outlook by kdun19ham
?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8ezpqa wrote
Reply to Altman vs. Yudkowsky outlook by kdun19ham
Why does everyone assume that AGI is an agent and not just passive software like any other?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8etpqu wrote
Reply to comment by Agarikas in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
There's been a lot of bizarre mental masturbation math being created since the 19th century.
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8ei6vk wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in The naivety of arguments on both sides of the AGI debate is quite frustrating to look at by Particular_Number_68
How did Eliza work?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8eeegf wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
What do you mean computation is needed to discover algorithms?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8ee988 wrote
Reply to comment by PrivateUser010 in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
I wonder why these algorithms didn't come out in the 60's.
FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8e71cc wrote
Reply to This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
Why are there studies on GPT-3.5 in 2020 if it appeared in 2022?
FusionRocketsPlease t1_jd3dupv wrote
Reply to comment by Smart-Tomato-4984 in A technical, non-moralist breakdown of why the rich will not, and cannot, kill off the poor via a robot army. by Eleganos
Who are these rich monsters you're talking about?