FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8diuz2 wrote on February 13, 2023 at 2:46 PM

Reply to comment by 94746382926 in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414

This type of paper should not be published before passing all possible tests that can refute the claim in the title...

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j8cvyfk wrote on February 13, 2023 at 11:02 AM

Reply to Bing Chat blew ChatGPT out of the water on my bespoke "theory of mind" puzzle by Fit-Meet1359

We have evidence that not even animals don't have theory of mind, but you think a computer program does.

FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j83ii0i wrote on February 11, 2023 at 10:40 AM

Reply to comment by Tiamatium in How far are we from this technology? by FusionRocketsPlease

I asked some generic questions and he gave some answers that seem to be correct from the tutorial.

FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j83idfn wrote on February 11, 2023 at 10:38 AM

Reply to comment by blueSGL in How far are we from this technology? by FusionRocketsPlease

I don't want one that creates something so generalized with a prompt. I want one where I can create every last detail without needing those ultra-complex menus and years of practice.

FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j83grcr wrote on February 11, 2023 at 10:14 AM

Reply to comment by TFenrir in How far are we from this technology? by FusionRocketsPlease

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH Damn bro, I'm excited to know that cool people have thought the same as me and are putting it into practice. I can't wait for what's next!

FusionRocketsPlease OP t1_j80ashd wrote on February 10, 2023 at 6:04 PM

Reply to comment by Substantial_Space478 in How far are we from this technology? by FusionRocketsPlease

Imagine not having to spend hundreds of hours tinkering with that anti-intuitive stuff.

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j60m1lq wrote on January 26, 2023 at 9:34 PM

Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in Last night I had perhaps the most interesting conversation of my life entirely with a Joseph Stalin chat AI. We discussed hours of philosophy and morals, and it's responses and original questions truly baffled me. Part 1 of the chat log is listed below. by TBabb01

Iq is burgoise number

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j60lacz wrote on January 26, 2023 at 9:29 PM

Reply to comment by mihaicl1981 in How life with UBI could look like by Financial_Donut_64

I am immune to the crisis of meaning because I don't work on something that I think would make me feel valuable, in fact it's the opposite, I feel like a failure, therefore I no longer feel that I have any value.

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j550mgb wrote on January 20, 2023 at 1:15 PM

Reply to comment by PIPPIPPIPPIPPIP555 in I asked ChatGPT if it is sentient, and I can't really argue with its point by wtfcommittee

>mega-reductionist-Uber-atheist

😂😂

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j54zrt2 wrote on January 20, 2023 at 1:07 PM

Reply to comment by sticky_symbols in I asked ChatGPT if it is sentient, and I can't really argue with its point by wtfcommittee

And we definitely have no rational reason to believe that he has qualia.

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j36r2pm wrote on January 6, 2023 at 12:46 PM

Reply to comment by LarsPensjo in I asked ChatGPT if it is sentient, and I can't really argue with its point by wtfcommittee

Try asking an unusual question that one would have to reason with to answer. He will miss. This has already been shown in this same sub today.

FusionRocketsPlease t1_j36ke9e wrote on January 6, 2023 at 11:36 AM

Reply to comment by eve_of_distraction in I asked ChatGPT if it is sentient, and I can't really argue with its point by wtfcommittee

Yup. Now it remains to know how rays qualitative characteristics arise from quantities without these characteristics. If you talk about emergency, you'll get a block.