GeneSaw
GeneSaw t1_iui2d8c wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
You seem to be under the impression that there are definite answers to these questions. Like is something good. For someone it is, for someone it isn't. Neither is no more right than the other. That's why they are called opinions.
GeneSaw t1_iuhvnwb wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
They are obvious flaws to you, not to me. So you are ignorant to the fact that your opinion is not an actual fact but just something you see as right. My opinion is just as valid as yours.
GeneSaw t1_iuhg7by wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
So I'm brainwashed since my opinion differs from yours? I would say that's rich but sadly it's just the common practice for ignorant plebs, it seems.
GeneSaw t1_iuhfrn1 wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
Don't know what to say. I don't mind it. You clearly do. That's a shame.
GeneSaw t1_iuhf8wj wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
Even in Team Deathmatch or Domination the basic principle is only to go in and shoot what you see. It's simple and people like it for it. And I personally don't see why Re:verse "plays like ass". I personally think the over-the-shoulder works just fine in pvp too.
GeneSaw t1_iuhem59 wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
You're saying it like it's bad thing. There is a reason why every Call of Duty has sold so well. People like simpler things. The more complicated games always have a smaller playerbase. But that of course doesn't mean one is better than the other because how popular it is. Re:verse is just more easily accessible and has more room to grow.
GeneSaw t1_iuhc2t1 wrote
Reply to Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
To Each their own. I have personally enjoyed it. Is it a perfect multiplayer experience? No. But does it have to be? Also no. The matches are quick enough to get a few in if I'm waiting on something else. The game could use some more content atm but that is coming so I don't mind. I can see why some people don't like it but I enjoy it.
Same can't be said for Resistance... As someone who has over 3,000 hours in Dead by Daylight, some 500 hours in Friday the 13th and has started recently playing The Evil Dead game, Resistance is an awful asymmetrical game.
The survivor side of the game is too reliant on the team having extensive knowledge of the game mechanics for it to be enjoyable. Yea, if you have a group of 4 friends you can make it work but most of us don't have that. If someone goes afk, the game is over before it even starts.
In my experience, the mastermind side is either too OP or gets absolutely destroyed. There is no in between. It depends solely on if the survivors know what they're doing since you are too reliant on timers on your abilities.
But like I said, to each their own. I prefer Re:verse since it's much more approachable and simpler game. Resistance requires much more "getting into it" which isn't a very good design choice imo.
GeneSaw t1_iui7lmp wrote
Reply to comment by DevastaTheSeeker in Resident Evil RE:Verse is awful by DevastaTheSeeker
I knew you would try to bring the majority thing into this. That changes nothing. There used to be a time when majority of people "knew for a fact" that the world was flat. Remind me, how did that turn out, exactly? Mind you, some people still think that (I'm guessing you're one of them based on your ignorant views) but there are actual proof of that not being so. Can you point me a proof that mayo on a cake is not good? Other than you and likely many others just say so?
And if you want to bring Dark Cloud into this, I personally preferred the first one and thought the sequel wad kinda meh. But that, again, is my opinion on the matter. Doesn't make it a fact.