GhostOfRobertTreat

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_izcm8pr wrote

Sad to see a nice building go but we need more housing especially near Penn. If we try to preserve every old building, we won’t be able to accommodate the people who want to move here and rent pressure will continue to get worse and worse. Maybe we should look to preserve some areas of the neighborhood that have special significance or have a density of historic features like Bruen between Green and Elm but we can’t say demolition of every old building is bad.

8

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_iuzd7zj wrote

I’m sure you’ll do a great job stopping criminals. So many gun owners with these fantasies. Ain’t gonna happen. More likely you’ll end up killing someone that doesn’t have to die or some kid will get your get gun.

You make shit like this more likely: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/09/two-michigan-drivers-shoot-and-kill-each-other-after-road-rage-incident

1

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_iuo78cl wrote

The issues tomorrow will be the demolition of the existing buildings and the design of the new ones. If you support this tower and want to speak publicly, it is important to note the existing buildings are not worth saving and the new one complements the other historic buildings in the district and doesn’t detract from them. Similar situation to the newest glass Prudential tower on Broad. Decrepit out of use buildings replaced by a tower that brings life to the neighborhood.

3

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_itl4bdf wrote

Community boards like this are bad. They serve to prevent development. We already have local elected officials and professional planning boards where the public can speak. Who chooses who sits on a community board? Who gets to represent the community? We have elections to decide that. NYC has these and they’re fucking terrible. At a minimum the extra time and effort to get through ends up raising the cost of a building and requires higher rents to make up for it. Hope it stays dead.

6