Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivcn9xr wrote
Reply to comment by CJYP in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
It seems like we're talking past each other. Drivers don't expect anyone to jump a light because that's illegal. Your perception of the safety of doing so is irrelevant. You don't see every car in every situation, so the expectation of drivers is important to your safety too. In general, drivers rely on the predictability of what's around them because of the inertia of a vehicle. Decisions have to be made in advance to keep everyone alive, and having the expectation that people are following the rules of the road is an important part of making those predictions. If you ever drove, I think this would be pretty intuitive to you.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivc2uu9 wrote
Reply to comment by IntelligentCicada363 in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
There is no law that gives you general license to routinely break traffic rules on your perception of safety. Sorry bout that.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivc2h6g wrote
Reply to comment by CJYP in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
People don't expect anyone to jump the light. I have no idea why you think it's safer for you to break traffic laws while being sanctimonious at everyone.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivbplbp wrote
Reply to comment by dny6 in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
More surveillance tech? No thanks.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivbpjn6 wrote
Reply to comment by Optimal_Pineapple_41 in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
In fact this is already the case. There are hardly any intersections where it's not already posted, as far as I've seen.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivbp6wo wrote
Reply to comment by CJYP in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
That's not what the law currently says though, and not what drivers expect.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iva3tsi wrote
Reply to comment by Boston_Dan_ in Who approved Blue River Terps? by [deleted]
Bro? What are you trying to say, bro?
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iv8igq5 wrote
Reply to comment by Boston_Dan_ in Who approved Blue River Terps? by [deleted]
Smoking is already illegal in the playground areas of public parks and on school grounds.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iv8i292 wrote
Reply to Who approved Blue River Terps? by [deleted]
Omg, there's also a pub right across the street from the school there. Actually, now that I look at the map, there's a Montessori school right next door to Atwoods too. Lol. Think of the children!
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iv4vfqr wrote
Reply to Insurance background by kumquatrodeo
I think most of the national insurance companies are here, aren't they?
If you get into an accident, exchange insurance information with the other driver (calmly) and then call your insurance company. You make a claim with the insurance company, and then they either send an adjuster out, and/or they give you a list of preferred garages to take it to.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iv4uxwg wrote
Reply to Hey there r/CambridgeMA! by thatguy10095
I'm a big supporter of rule 3, particularly as it applies to the great bicycle wars of 2022. That aside, it would be great to get more postings about upcoming local events. It seems like many groups tend to use facebook to announce these things, but since I don't use facebook, it would be great to get some of those announcements here too.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iv3egvl wrote
Reply to comment by PGT13 in Brattle Street bike lanes are being installed next week. by greemp
Is that China's covid policy?
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuw6k0y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Changing of the guard, and goodbye. by taylorhayward_boston
What's wrong with you?
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuvlwtl wrote
Reply to comment by ExpressiveLemur in Come join /r/camberville! by kjeovridnarn
Expectation of safety is an interesting point. There are definitely generational differences here. When I was growing up, there was really an expectation that I was responsible for my own safety on a bike, but it was still a pretty clearly dangerous way to get around town. It was just down to situational awareness, helmets, and deference pretty much. We had no bike lanes, which are now really well built out over the last 10 years. So that seems to be improving a lot. It is still not a very safe activity fundamentally. There are no safety features on a bicycle whatsoever, so I guess I personally have some expectation when I get on the bike that there's some risk that's a bit higher than, for example, taking the T.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuv3m4x wrote
Reply to comment by Lentamentalisk in Come join /r/camberville! by kjeovridnarn
It sounds like both you and the mod are having real life conflicts with people that you want to moan about passive aggressively on the internet. And both are shocked to find that there are people who respond negatively/counterproductively to that. As for your description of the people with whom you have conflicts, online or offline, I guess it sounds a lot like you want this to be a culture war since you believe you know exactly what's in the minds of others. You're really bringing this ugliness on yourself, in that respect, which puts you in a pretty bad spot to then complain about it.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuv2wc5 wrote
Reply to comment by No_Dance1739 in Open Request for Ideas on Cambridgema Can Be Made a Better Community by taylorhayward_boston
Wait a sec, now calling out toxicity is toxic? Come on. I think you just don't want to hear any dissent. If there's nuance here somewhere, I'm not hearing it. The toxicity I replied to was a bunch of sarcasm and snide for no purpose. People genuinely don't understand why there is so much bicycle anger. I myself am deeply upset about climate issues, but I know who my enemy is on that. They're not for the most part my fellow Cantabrigians.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuss1c3 wrote
Reply to comment by No_Dance1739 in Open Request for Ideas on Cambridgema Can Be Made a Better Community by taylorhayward_boston
Sorry, I'm just trying to understand the intensity of the conflict. Is that toxic? If telling some people that they might be losing their bearings in an argument is toxic, I don't know really how to apply a reality check. The trouble is that I haven't heard any actual argument of substance about this stuff. It's just some kind of bicycle identity group with whom some of us don't feel kinship. Maybe if you could help us understand why this is such a motivating aspect of your identity, we'd get it. I use a bicycle to commute for part of the year. The bike lanes are dramatically better now than 10 years ago, when none of them existed at all. Seems good?
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuqqcx6 wrote
Reply to comment by defenestron in Open Request for Ideas on Cambridgema Can Be Made a Better Community by taylorhayward_boston
This seems like the toxic kind of response that's at issue. I agree with your observation that the room seems to want to engage in this toxicity, which is kind of a better argument against your point than for it. We're talking about bicycles here folks. Maybe a little perspective is in order.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iupbx9w wrote
Reply to comment by akanefive in Open Request for Ideas on Cambridgema Can Be Made a Better Community by taylorhayward_boston
Yeah, a single mod, or even a sub with one dominant mod, isn't ideal. That said, maybe there's a good argument to be made that the great bicycle wars need a ceasefire? This is clearly a really serious topic to some, but to others it seems like a bizarre over-the-top caricature of activism.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuotk5j wrote
Reply to comment by akanefive in Open Request for Ideas on Cambridgema Can Be Made a Better Community by taylorhayward_boston
Or maybe it's worth stepping out of your shoes and seeing whether your high intensity flame war would make sense to an outsider? Because I don't know that it would.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuot9v3 wrote
Reply to comment by darkshaddow42 in Come join /r/camberville! by kjeovridnarn
I kind of agree with the mod. There's a high intensity bicycle argument on reddit that is really angry. These are obviously important things to figure out locally, but I don't understand how a sleepy topic like bike lanes turned into a culture war. It's intense.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuol5ac wrote
Reply to comment by gizm770o in Open Request for Ideas on Cambridgema Can Be Made a Better Community by taylorhayward_boston
Are you sure that yours isn't? Reading these posts as someone who has no idea what's going on or what the conflict is seems surreal.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iuojvm1 wrote
Reply to Come join /r/camberville! by kjeovridnarn
I seem to have missed the underlying conflict here. It sounds dramatic and bicycle -related on the basis of the comments here and posts over there....?
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_itnkk1j wrote
Reply to comment by WaitForItTheMongols in Starbucks in Central Square by vbm-seaside-71
If you're complaining about a small uptick in crime but really believe we're on the edge of the apocalypse, it seems like I'd be wasting my efforts trying to convince you that crime is relatively quite low on a historical basis. I wish you the best of luck in your apocalypse, and maybe I will catch up with you when you emerge from your basement.
Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_ivcoxmv wrote
Reply to comment by CJYP in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake
It's irrelevant because it isn't legal here. If you're doing it and nobody else knows, then it can't possibly be safer than following the law is.