I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM

I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM t1_j1c3z8w wrote

Reply to comment by JackMitcham in The US economy grew much faster than previously thought in the third quarter by barrinmw

I think what the fed is worried about is rising wages will entrench price increases that are causing inflation, and that the supply side issues we've been having since covid haven't resolved fully. It's not just that they don't like rising wages. The context is that rising wages won't mean much if everything else also rises. The Fed isn't some evil anti labor organization. They exist to prevent the next great depression, and the monetary policy to do that can look unintuitive.

7

I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM t1_j15lk8t wrote

Reply to comment by ohyonghao in Study finds AI assistants help developers produce code that's more likely to be buggy / Computer scientists from Stanford University have found that programmers who accept help from AI tools like Github Copilot produce less secure code than those who fly solo. by Sorin61

This is true of ChatGPT as well. It looks like really convincing text, but I asked it a math question that it got confidently completely wrong. I've heard the same from professional physicists. It's dangerous because it's convincing but also completely wrong.

2

I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM t1_iyf7ejq wrote

Reply to Effective Altruism Is Pushing a Dangerous Brand of ‘AI Safety’ | This philosophy—supported by tech figures like Sam Bankman-Fried—fuels the AI research agenda, creating a harmful system in the name of saving humanity by Hrmbee

I think there's a really really big question about consent regarding the text to image models that are trained on billions of images without the original artist's knowledge. Of course Billionaire tech dickheads don't care about that, they just see an opportunity to automate more of their workforce.

3