It is more sophisticated text generator. Nothing else. AI term is misleading that creates unnecessary sensation.

It is first, second and third (and the rest) % of domination. So China is dark blue in those where it is first. Australia is dark blue in lithium for instance.

Jobs you listed will be first to receive new assistant tools which they have been receiving for decades. From new programming languages, IDEs, accounting tools, tools to go through massive amount of evidence and material, etc. And those jobs still exist. In fact there is more of them than ever. And they will continue existing with better productivity. Current form of AI technology which includes a bit better models in the future does not threaten it anymore than Excel did. No jobs were lost back then, no jobs will be lost now.

Workers will always be needed. Just like when we industrialized and suddenly 90% people suddenly no longer had to work on fields to feed themselves. So they learned new skills overtime. Answer now is as always better expertise and more skills and flexibility. Which means better education.

It is 10 times bigger than its predecessor. It uses 45 TB dataset. You also operate under assumption that mode data will be better. This is not true. Smaller and carefully picked dataset like this one will be able to solve frequently asked questions. Ask for something out of the box of what it was trained for and it is lost. If you introduced data for that niche problems then you will also increase variety of AI responses which in turn will decrease current accuracy for more frequent problems.

Because while you use great logic with "if there is bigger demand for batteries there will be more companies making batteries", you completely fail to apply this exact same logic to mining lithium to increase supply and increased demand to it.

Yeah this is completely wrong. Solar panels are not reliant on rare earth metals at all. The thing it needs the most is silicon which is everywhere and accounts for roughtly 25% of this planet's crust. There will be shortage for batteries. But this has nothing to do with price per kWh from solar produced.

This is absolute nonsense. The only thing He admitted is that it was rushed. Not that it was wrong. Also it is outdated already. Tesla's factories are way more productive than other car maker companies. And it is not even close. Every company strives to remove low skilled workers. It is just about calculations on return of interest. Not some absurd "human touch". Everyone on engineering position in the industry will tell you that.

Way more important than that is general safety of business. You can buy skilled workers if you have none (and China does not even have that many people on the top, they have more of a high skilled low and medium jobs workforce rather than high skilled job one). Either way you can not buy safe environment for your business where ruling dictator just does not wake up one day and steal all your stuff.

Yeah, tell us? How much do they generate?

Decrease in emissions is not really possible as of now is it? CO2 is not going anywhere. We would have to start "harvesting" it.

% decrease in emissions is incredibly flawed metric. If you have 1000 imaginary units of CO2 and increase it by 100 then it was increase of 10%. Next year you have 1100. You now increase it by 105. Increase of only 9.5%. So growth slowed down right? Except that not really because 105>100. CO2 grew more than last time, only "slower" relative to total sum.