IamSauerKraut

IamSauerKraut t1_j9zhmii wrote

You can always convince folks of the righteousness of your argument by inserting "traitorous" and "fascists" and other emotionally charged opinion (some of which is unrelated to the issue at hand). It also helps to post patronizing and gratuitous verbiage. Pat yourself on the back.

2

IamSauerKraut t1_j9z4v95 wrote

>Even just kids knowing a teachers name and finding their facebook page where they posted going to a club is "inappropriate".

Way to turn my comment on its head.

The issue presented here is not a kid knowing a name and looking for the facebook page; rather, it is (alleged) that the teacher, knowing the contents of their own page, encouraged the students to go visit the page. That is what is inappropriate sharing.

4

IamSauerKraut t1_j9ylfpr wrote

>Not every group is a potential audience for activism because you feel, of course, your message is super critical and HAS to reach them. Everyone will use that rationale - and has been - and its how oppression happens. Just take a step back and understand sometimes people in marginalized groups can cross lines too. She did.

​

Hard to disagree.

−2

IamSauerKraut t1_j9ykwql wrote

>I remember many teachers in high school who would attempt to be “cool” and build relationships with students

Oh yeah.

Only recently has a concerted effort been made to put an end to these "relationships." My chem teacher, married, knocked up a sophomore. My US History teacher was banging a junior. Neither faced consequences beyond some well-placed comments from female colleagues.

7

IamSauerKraut t1_j9ykgr2 wrote

>I just saw a video on Twitter of a male teacher that accidentally had his Facebook up on the projector while looking at women's profiles where they were in bikinis.

How does such a thing occur accidentally? Teacher needs to be smart enough to never have this occurrence be possible. Less of an accident than carelessness, imho, and should be addressed by the building admin.

4

IamSauerKraut t1_j9yk80k wrote

>When the story was actually "a teacher told some students what her tiktok handle was".

Given the content of the account, the handle should not have been shared.

In today's environment, a teacher's social media presence needs to be squeaky clean. If it is not, then why is the teacher sharing the handle?

I agree with the person who posits that this is less about gender identity than it is about appropriate behavior.

5

IamSauerKraut t1_j9u10bk wrote

1

IamSauerKraut t1_j9tx3qw wrote

The last claimed Civil War participant to die was Alfred Henry Woolson. Interestingly, the year of death appears to be in dispute: either 1953 or 1956 or 1959. DOB is agreed upon, 1843, as is his role during the Civil War: drummer boy. He was either 106 or 109 upon death.

In close second was Col. Walter Williams. He is said to have congratulated Woolson on reaching 109. But the dates of their last appearances and deaths clash. Cannot be in grand marshall in a parade once dead.

Bruce Caton stated years ago that 1950 saw 65 Civil War vets still alive. But none in 1960. 1950, however, was long after 1914. Which adds a bit of a question to the claim re Col. Chamberlain.

3

IamSauerKraut t1_j9tngab wrote

Often hazy along the 81 corridor with all the truck traffic and location in a valley. The haze often stretches up past Harrisburg and into Berks County. You can see the brown soot from the viewpoints on South and Kittatinny Mountains on quite a few days.

2