Iffykindofguy
Iffykindofguy t1_j70ji3n wrote
Reply to comment by Smellz_Of_Elderberry in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
maybe but either way it wont be by centuries
Iffykindofguy t1_j6y5tth wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
I agree, youll see mechanical helpers on site within the next decade
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xxswa wrote
Reply to comment by Economy_Variation365 in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
I work in production so we were filming a demo but the only thing that was set up was the processor, the trucks we worked on were actually just normal trucks that the facility got every day. Didnt work perfectly but that was mostly in the install process, once it was up it was churning.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xwild wrote
Negative ghostrider. Time to stop posting pics except privately to your trusted circle until something comes along. Also vote blue so that we can get more laws in more states on the books about this sort of thing. Sorry this is on your mind, its a reasonable fear (that someone you know may do this, not that you'll just get caught up in some massive web of deepfakes) but unfortunately there doesn't appear to be a reasonable solution yet.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xr2um wrote
Reply to comment by Economy_Variation365 in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-IwGbEIU08 this is a commercial so clearly its hyped up a bit but Im too lazy to find another example. Ive seen a system like this working, in person.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xqkgq wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
Humans are machines. AI's physical body will be a machine. Youre getting lost in the details. My point was simply that a lot of blue collar replacements you seem to think would need entire world simulations for don't require that.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6xhjgw wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
A machine build to operate on a construction site does not need an internalized model of the whole world, especially if that machine is able to access new information streams constantly.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6x0cre wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
No, you do not need to have an internalized model of the whole world, that's an 80s solution to 80s sci fi paradoxes
Iffykindofguy t1_j6x09sl wrote
Reply to The next Moravec's paradox by CharlisonX
Its far from useless on blue-collar jobs. It will start out as an aid on those jobs like any other. Already see it in a lot of city infrastructure jobs. My town has an app that you (a city worker, not a random) can take and place your phone on a bridge and based off the vibrations (and a few other variables taken from video footage you get also with the phone after) it can tell you where the bridge is most likely to need repairs. They can unload trucks with robots now, something that a few years ago I watched a ted talk on how that would be impossible unless everything in the truck was uniform or prepackaged a certain way that made the loading so inefficient the unloading benefits were all lost. Theyre coming for all jobs.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6wxvez wrote
Reply to comment by iNstein in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
Lol you sweet summer child
Iffykindofguy t1_j6uk2ku wrote
Reply to comment by TFenrir in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
I do and sorry for being so intense but you came at me hot and you're talking some nonsense. You went from no one will be doing anything to oh well no one can be the best at their job so no one will want to do anything to....? My entire point from the jump is just that people arent going to just sit idly by and die. A generation may over indulge if we get some relief from the current capitalist hellscape we have at the moment but before long people will get bored. Not to mention people are aware of this problem, why wouldn't they take steps to avoid not knowing how our daily life functions?
Iffykindofguy t1_j6uh92m wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
...
​
Are you drunk? I accused you of moving goalposts. Because at first you were arguing no one would have a job and now youre talking about having to be the best at the job.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6ugqa8 wrote
Reply to comment by TFenrir in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
I never ever ever said we wouldnt replace a significant portion of the infrastructure so Im going to stop reading there. When you'd like to have a serious discussion and stop moving goalposts, stop lying, come back and talk like an adult.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6ugk2g wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
So now people have to be the absolute best? Oh nice job moving the goal posts there pal. Again, the entire point is just that people still have agency. You seem to think everyone will fuck off and game all day long. That's not the case.
In addition to that I think you both seem to believe in some sort of framework to our society that doesn't exist. If there was a coordinated attack on the power grid or if the internet were to suddenly turn off tomorrow we would experience mass chaos and violence in the confusion. We are past the point of no return.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6uf6ne wrote
Reply to comment by TFenrir in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
Yeah some people would absolutely be about that life, you think they make video games simulating that sort of thing because no is interested in making and organizing a system? Again, both of you appear to be intellectually lazy and so you assume others will be the same.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6udv3y wrote
Reply to comment by TFenrir in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
I'm sorry that you cant pick up on peoples intent but that's not my fault.
I'm also sorry that you're confused, yet again, on both points. Please really give some thought to the slow down I mentioned. What will people be doing when theyre not working? Why would they give up being curious about things? Because you're not a curious person?
Iffykindofguy t1_j6ucpqv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
No.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6uckrt wrote
Reply to comment by TFenrir in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
No shit chatgpt doesnt give you anything unprompted, you don't see the difference between prompting for a poem and prompting for a poem specifically about taking over mankind?
​
And their point is not that we will relinquish control willingly, their point is we will do that and do nothing in the new free time. That is what I find silly. So it seems you didn't understand either point, maybe slow down on the reply button.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6tz228 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
I think the same of you
Iffykindofguy t1_j6txhst wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
How is talking about humans continuing to exist and be active like talking about souls and spirits? Jesus christ we got a "logic" guy over here lol. Humans arent really lazy or greedy, though many of us are. Its kind of fallout from how our society developed. That'll change as we grow.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6tveqi wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
"Some people" do not, some people do know how this works partially here, some know what works there, no one knows globally. Youre protecting a facade, something that isn't there. And yes, your progression is such 80s horror nonsense its cliche at this point. It absolutely could replace all those things and I agree that it would be bit by bit without anyone knowing but you act like there's will be no human activity in those times other than lounging about. Thats not how humans work.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6ttzmn wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Why do people think they might witness AGI taking over the world in a singularity? by purepersistence
What a silly post. You act like ChatGPT just threw that out there instead of was prompted "write a poem about an ai taking over the world" Also your logic is not that great because the vast vast vast majority of people don't know how anything works right now anyways. Ill take computers in charge over the 1% 100% of the time.
Iffykindofguy t1_j6phuj6 wrote
Reply to I’m a gun nerd and I would like a game that has a wide amount of weapons. Preferably I would like open world, something like Fallout and Ghost Recon. by ClipyBoi_3
MGSV on pc with the gun mods
Iffykindofguy t1_j6pa6ns wrote
I dont finish most of my games and I enjoy most of my time playing.
Iffykindofguy t1_j71u6l0 wrote
Reply to comment by Soft-Flamingo6003 in Protecting ourselves against Deepfakes by Soft-Flamingo6003
I mean I agree with you that it shouldn't be happening but it has nothing to do with willing? Its just fact. Im not telling you to shut up and put up with it, just that what you're looking for doesn't exist yet so either do something about it or adapt. Im just answering the question you asked.