LOL at you claiming theres a hard timeline to any of this, much less something as absurd as post-scarcity being a requirement for a singularity

Humans adapt, well figure it out. A) who knows if it will happen b)who knows if whatever disaster you're imagining is what does happens C) Its normal to feel this way, the world does look fucking insane so don't take me saying this stuff as trying to invalidate your feelings but theyre probably just a bit excessively high right now.

As already stated, those jobs are 30 years too late. Again, you're just so confused its hard to have a conversation so now I will say goodnight and mean it. Have a good one!

We passed there being more jobs in "Green" energy than fossil fuels back in 2017 in the us.

​

GG you're just showing that you're not only constantly requiring assumptions for your arguments to be expressed, you're now just a flat-out liar.

I think they would invest in research and switch to green energy instead of spending 30 years lying to the public about it.

​

Your second point is literal nonsense.

​

I know you don't understand my point. Its clear you don't understand a lot of whats being said here. I gave you all the clues you need, I told you where to go for record profits and still workers getting the axe. You live in a fantasy.

​

Hope you have a good weekend.

Yes things have been done as weve progressed, the bare minimum. Many of those things have been delayed for years or decades by interested groups in capitalism. Things arent white or black youre right.

​

A form of socialism is probably the answer. I don't know, Im not an economist. I only know that capitalism is the cause currently.

Workers would not demand growth at all cost if that growth came at the cut of their jobs. Look to the games industry's recent success to see that doesn't go the opposite way. All fantasy. You are all fantasy lol.

So many assumptions Im about done with you.

​

a) Capitalism does not focus on the environment, some companies claim to but you'll notice nothing has been done to curb fossil fuel companies for example. Capitalism only focuses on growth at all costs because that's the way the system was designed.

B) I never said anything about market socialism and there are more than two types of economic situation so again, silly assumptions wasting our time

C) No, they wouldn't because they wouldn't have the shareholders unreasonably expecting growth at all costs so they can live the American dream.

​

Its capitalism because capitalism is the thing that demands growth at all costs.

You didnt address any of them, you just said because none of them prioritize the environment none of them will.

​

New owners? Do you think getting rid of capitalism means keeping the same structure and just replacing the people?

​

No. Capitalism requires growth at all costs. I don't know where your fantasy is coming from but if a company doesn't grow, it eventually dies or gets bought out.

​

You haven't said anything about any other ideology for me to talk about you silly goose. You just keep screaming about the joys of capitalism

Lolol why are you ranting like a lunatic? I already said that they don't prioritize the environment but since they don't have to focus on growth at all cost they can be smarter about their choices. Capitalism has to be focused on growth at all costs so it is impossible for it to prioritize anything else. Full stop. No one took advantage of me? I am thriving in the capitalist system. I still am able to recognize it has problems.

You're wildly confused. Growth at all cost mostly comes once a company goes public. The shareholders wont allow, not deliberately, for foresight in their leadership so its a constant revolving door of people aiming for growth at all costs.

Youre talking fantasy, Im talking real world. Capitalism is the root cause.

Nothing. But when growth at all costs is not the tentpole of your "ideology" it frees you up to look at other things.

We already could become sustainable in a lot of ways and choose not to because of capitalism. You cant ask shareholders to suffer loses for 5 years while you transition so all planning is about short term profits. AI wont help with that

I didnt have any of those things happen. Regardless, you didn't answer my question you just came up with some random comments.

Why do you think capitalism is the best "social system" people have come up with? Look at the state the worlds in lol

How do you know what the owner intended

Of course, the supreme court is not based in law anymore its based in the feelings of the right

Sorry it hurts your feelings bud but that's neither hear nor their

Ive been using it with no issues since launch, are you basing this off your experience or msnbc stories?

Why would it only lure Tesla? Im not familiar with battery tech

Actually, I guess Im dumb because the drone part is describing the remote human. Cut out the remote human and its something else.

UMMMMMMMMMMMMMM taxing "robot labor" is not at all like the rest of those things.

So if an AI is piloting it does that make it a drone?

I thank the universe I grew out of my "jaded" phase

No, correct as far as I checked every single thing I took from it because my job depends on it. I didn't rely on it, its brand spanking new.

Uhhhhhhh Ive been using it and getting (mostly) correct results. Its been truly better than I ever expected. Ive had to fix a few things but its made my work life easier until it takes it totally