Ilanaspax

Ilanaspax t1_izdfrsg wrote

There are no low cost of living areas anymore because of gentrification and anything remotely affordable is quickly diminishing. Welcome to planet earth - you’ll catch up soon!

I’m really proud of you for knowing people in the heights and journal square but JC is huge and that isn’t all of it so I don’t know what point you think you are making.

0

Ilanaspax t1_izb9h3d wrote

You realize not all poor people are criminals right? And they need a place to live too?

Also there is still plenty of crime lol JC famously under reports stats but if you know anyone in other neighborhoods shootings are a regular occurrence.

https://www.nj.com/hudson/2022/09/when-will-jersey-city-post-crime-stats-online-and-why-did-they-disappear-from-website-officials-wont-say.html?outputType=amp

1

Ilanaspax t1_iy85jsv wrote

Reply to comment by badquarter in Pepé Le Pew by Downtown-Prompt-6499

Yes it’s totally worth it - who cares if the city is drowning financially, Fulop has proven to be corrupt, and we are clearly getting ripped off by this deal? Where else will anyone in this humble city get the chance to see a Matisse in person?!

−10

Ilanaspax t1_iwqcb6e wrote

I know it’s hard to imagine - but plenty of people lived here before Fulop sold out the town to developers and were totally fine with not having a sweet green and a bunch of shitty restaurants on Newark Ave in exchange for affordable rent.

They made a MAKE IT YOURS JC campaign and then it’s shocked pikachu face when the entire city gets steamrolled by development. The goal was always high rents and pricing long time residents out. That’s why it’s so funny to see the rubes on here pretending more luxury housing is the solution instead of the cause. You have to be incredibly naive or a real estate shill to think more luxury housing is going to make anything more affordable when they all work together to artificially inflate rents.

−4